Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
6 pages/β‰ˆ1650 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Creative Writing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Ethical Decision Making Essay

Essay Instructions:

ETHICAL DECISION MAKING PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
The purpose of this assignment is to develop the ability to apply professional values, codes of ethics, and a decision-making model to the process of ethical decision making.
Your paper must be in current APA format including title page, abstract and reference page. The body of your paper must be 6–9 pages and include at least 6 references. Your paper must be well-thought-out and demonstrate critical thinking.
A. Begin by reading through the entire document, “A Practitioner’s Guide to Ethical Decision Making.” This is necessary BEFORE you begin to apply the decision making steps to an ethical scenario.
B. After reading the ethical decision making document above, choose one of the ethical dilemmas from the document entitled, “Ethical Decision Making Paper Scenarios,” found under the assignment instructions in bb . Read and analyze the chosen scenario.
C. Approach the scenario as if it has already happened and now you must address the problems the scenario has created. In other words, as in much of real life and practice, you must now do damage control.
D. To apply the steps of the ethical decision making model to your chosen scenario, divide the body of your paper—formatted in current APA style—into the steps outlined in the “A Practioner’s Guide to Ethical Decision Making” document, and outlined below, making sure to address all questions for each section:
• Identify the problem(s). In this section make sure to:
o Outline the facts, separating out innuendos, assumptions, hypotheses, or suspicions.
o Correctly and clearly identify the problem(s) by answering the questions, “Is this problem an ethical, legal, professional, or clinical problem? Is it a combination of more than one of these?”
o Identify the problem as related to self, client, institution, or agency. In other words, answer the questions, “Is the issue related to me and what I am or am not doing? Is it related to a client and/or the client's significant others and what they are or are not doing? Is it related to the institution or agency and their policies and procedures?”
• Apply the ACA Code of Ethics. In this section make sure to:
o Identify all applicable ACA Code of Ethics. Which codes apply, or can address, the problem(s) presented in the scenario? Make sure to cite the code numbers.
• Determine the nature/dimensions of the dilemma. In this section make sure to:
o Correctly identify the moral principles of the profession that apply. In other words, which of the professional values apply to this problem? Autonomy, beneficence, justice, nonmaleficence, fidelity, and/or veracity? Why?
o Identify the relevant professional literature that applies to the dilemma. What does the professional literature say that might help you solve the problem? Go to the LUO databases and find articles or textbooks that address the problem. For example, what do experts say about the confidentiality, technology and counseling, etc.?
o Identify persons that would be consulted. Who could you consult that might help you come up with ideas to address the problem?
o Identify state or national professional associations that would be consulted. What professional associations or state boards might be able to give advice?
o
• Potential courses of action. In this section make sure to:
o List all potential courses of action. Brainstorm as many possible courses of action as possible.
• Consider consequences/Determine course of action. In this section make sure to:
o Describe the potential consequences and implications for each course of action.
o Identify the best course of action and explain why. In other words, considering the information you have gathered and the priorities you have set, evaluate each option and assess the potential consequences for all the parties involved. Ponder the implications of each course of action for the client, for others who will be effected, and for yourself as a counselor. Eliminate the options that clearly do not give the desired results or cause even more problematic consequences. Review the remaining options to determine which option or combination of options best fits the situation and addresses the priorities you have identified.
• Evaluate the selected course of action. In this section make sure to:
o Review the selected course of action to see if it presents any new ethical problems.
o Apply the tests of justice, publicity, and universality.
• Implement the course of action. In this section make sure to:
o Describe what steps will be taken to implement the course of action. In other words, step-by-step, what are you now going to do to address the problem and do damage control?
When you have completed your paper, save it as a Microsoft Word document under your name and assignment title (Example: Doe_J_Ethical_Minute_Paper). Submit it via the SafeAssign draft link in Module/Week 7 by Friday. Wait until the link indicates that SafeAssign has analyzed your paper and prepared a report.
Return to the SafeAssign report and evaluate the report. You will notice that SafeAssign often matches on headings, titles, and references. If you see matches on entire sentences or paragraphs that are not enclosed in quotation marks, then you have unintentionally plagiarized. You will need to go back and re-write those sections in your own words.
Submit your final assignment via SafeAssign and Tevera by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 7.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Date:
Problem Identification
Drawing from the analysis of case scenario 4, it is evident that there were both an ethical and a legal problem. Robin was patient admitted to an intensive residential facility for drug addiction, which should operate in accordance with the ethical standards set by the American Counseling Association (ACA). From the scenario, the patient was not provided with information regarding the interventions such as the assessments of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory which were meant to improve his health. Moreover, this ethical problem further escalated when Robin was denied the opportunity to see the results of the assessments. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services (2008), HIPPAA Privacy Rule state that patients have a right to access and obtain a copy of the information about their health. In this respect, scenario 4 was a case that would lead to a legal problem for the facility. Moreover, from ACA's perspective, it was unprofessional for the therapist to deny Robin from viewing the results of the assessments. The ethical, legal, and professional challenges emerging from the scenario have an impact on the residential facility as well as the therapist assigned to Robin. Although the therapist is considered as part of the organization, she still has an obligation to perform her duties according to professional standards and the existing law. The facility is directly linked to the problem because the rule of disallowing clients from accessing information about their health is anchored in its policies and procedures.
Application of the ACA Code of Ethics
The ethical problem in case scenario 4 can be assessed under Sections A and B of the ACA Code of Ethics. Section A provides the standards of counseling relationship while Section B provides of guidelines in matters concerning confidentiality and privacy (American Counseling Association, 2005). The Code under A.2.a examines the concept of informed consent and states that counselors are obligated to insightfully explain to clients the responsibilities and rights of both the patient and the counselor verbally and in writing. From the scenario, Robin was not informed and did not consent to the various assessments carried out on her. However, the Code envisages, under A.2.d, potential cases of counseling individuals who are not able to give voluntary consent such as minors and the mentally ill (American Counseling Association, 2005). Robin could not have been in a position to give consent to receive services in the facility and, therefore, the provider acted on the provision A.2.d to seek the assent of the patient.
Section B.1 require counselors to respect the rights of their clients. In the scenario, the act of disallowing disclosure of clients’ private information means that the provider’s policies adhere to the requirements of B.1.b and B.1.b which demand respect for privacy and confidentiality respectively. However, in the event Robin was not in capacity, during the admission, to voluntarily give consent to receive private information regarding her health, the facility is required, under B.5.c, to seek permission for disclosure from a third p...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now