Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
1 Source
Level:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Business Ethics Reluctant Security Guard case (Essay Sample)

Instructions:
Case Analysis #1 Read the Reluctant Security Guard case on pp. 177-180, and address the following questions. 1. Was the security guard right to take the actions he did? Would you have taken the same actions? Why or why not? 2. Is this a case of an unjust dismissal? Support your position. 3. Should there be a law to protect employees from losing their jobs for this kind of activity? 4. What create ways other than dismissal should management have utilized to handle the situation? Accessing journals and websites will enable you to incorporate more current information into your paper. Examine the Suggested Supplementary Readings on pp. 181-183. Do not plagiarize. You must provide footnotes and include a bibliography. Your paper should be between 4 and 6 pages in length. source..
Content:

BUSINESS ETHICS
Name:
Grade Course:
Tutor’s Name:
(26 October 2010)
Business Ethics
This essay is going to centralize on the unethical treatment which employees are subjected to by their employers. The essay shall detail the story of a young security guard named Tuff whose refutes to obey company policy which is in violation with the state of Minneapolis, and the police laws under which his working ethics of conducts are monitored. This will combine also with personal reflection on the happening which led to the unjust dismissal of Tuff as an employee of Blue Mountain Company.
Moral Ethics on the Security Guard Action
Tuff an employee of the blue mountain security company took the right action of being the whistler blow of this organization unethical policy. The policy which Tuff was on about was in violation of the employee’s rights which are protected under National Labor Relation Act of 1935. The employees were submitted to acting against their will on policies which are against the requirement of their licenses as noted by Pinedo and Beauchamp (1998).
The policy instilled by the Blue mountain company was in violation of the requirement instilled by the state concerning the conduct of the security officer behavior. The penalties which would have arise if one of the drunkards whom had been ushered into the road without reporting to the police caused harm to human life or accident resulting to property destruction, would have resulted to outright revocation of the license.
The merit behind Blue Mountain policy was targeted at pleasing their clients and also the drunken patrons who frequented the malls. This however, this policy was in violation of the conduct of security officers which are mandated by the county police department and Minnesota State and locals laws. Under Section V, subsection D which indicates that should there be a serious accident or criminal activity arise within the parameter where the licensee (security officer) is deployed, then the licensee should notify the police unit which they are assigned. However, failure to do so would result to revocation of the license. Further the promulgation rules behind the security officer license states that all lawful orders are to be obeying if they align with the orders promulgated by the superintendent police officer as echoed by Pinedo and Beauchamp (1998).
Personally I would also have taken the same action executed by Tuff, this action are based on the good of the majority of the people. The director of security Manuel Hernandez main concern was pleasing the clientele other than ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!