Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Case 10.1 Money Doesn't Buy Happiness

Essay Instructions:

Read Case 10.1 in Managing Human Resources. After reading the case, please complete the following items:
Write a summary of the case,
Answer the critical thinking questions, and
Elaborate on two key learnings from the case related to trends in employee benefits, legal implications, and cost-containment strategies. Be sure to clearly state the two key learnings and defend them in well-organized, scholarly responses.
A key learning is defined as significant knowledge gained from reading the case. You may choose to explain your key learnings by offering a real-world application, personal insight, your thoughts and opinions about what was stated, how it is handled at your company, etc.
Please arrange your summary, questions, and key learnings in a well-organized, scholarly response of 2 pages. Support your observations and opinions with citations from 2 credible sources.

Essay Sample Content Preview:


Name:
Institution;
Money doesn’t buy happiness. Well, on second thought…
Summary of the case

This case investigates the relationship between happiness and wealth of individuals and the entire nation as a whole. The bottom-line of the investigation is the conclusion that money doesn’t buy happiness. However, different scholars have various approaches to this question. First we meet the Easterlin paradox brought to light by the University of Pennsylvania Economist Richard Easterlin. In his study that he compared data from a relatively wealthy nation with that of a destitute country. He found out that poorer countries are happier than rich nations. He concluded that happiness is determined by an individual’s relative income rather than his absolute income.
Other two professors from Wharton, Betsey Stevenson, and Justin Wolfers come along to criticize Easterlin paradox claiming that it’s not paradoxical at all. They postulate that rich people and rich countries are happier than poor people and their countries. In other words, they concluded that GDP and happiness are directly proportional. The findings by Wolfers and Stevenson in the U.S influenced other economists especially in Britain. British economists started advocating policies that impact directly towards happiness of citizens (social welfare policies).With these developments, Easterlin would later concur with the two Wharton professors. However, this time round he added a new parameter. He believed that money alone does not translate to happiness.

Critically thinking

The role of money in determining personal satisfaction should not be underestimated. It’s only through money rewarded as wages that formulate financial plans that translate directly to personal satisfaction. Human beings are in pursuit of happiness that is only possible with a good personal income. Therefore, employers in companies should question their wage rates because, in the long run, the rates will affect the productivity of the enterprise. High wages keep employees happier (Broscoe, 2011).
The question of financial incentives
Managers in almost all corporations are faced with this common problem. Every manager regardless of the size, age or shape of his company struggles to de...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to happiness essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!