Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Visual & Performing Arts
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

The problem of evil (Essay Sample)

Instructions:
In an interview on closertotruth.com, the philosopher and theist Richard Swinburne argues that the Problem of Evil does not amount to a good argument against the existence of God <http://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=jARkbwgejgU>. Explain the Problem of Evil and critically evaluate Swinburne's reply to it. Swinburne makes a number of points as he responds to the Problem of Evil. You won't be able to cover all of this material. Pick one (or at most, two) of his arguments—the one you think is the strongest or most deserving of critical attention. Is it a good argument? Explain. Note: In preparing your essay, you should reread Mackie's discussion of the Problem of Evil (“Evil and Omnipotence”). You aren't required to discuss Mackie's views, but one strategy you are encouraged to take is to ask yourself what Mackie would say in response to Swinburne and frame your discussion as a debate. If you follow this strategy, you still need to develop your own view and argue for it, but it may help to think of yourself as adjudicating a debate rather than responding to a single thinker. Readings - Swinburne, Is Evil Necessary in God's World, part I: http://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=jARkbwgejgU - Mackie, Evil and Omnipotence source..
Content:

The Problem of Evil
Name:
Institution:
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
The problem of evil is a topic that numerous philosophers have attempted to describe in almost every aspect and that has brought controversies. Richard Swinburne, a philosopher as well as theist in one of his interviews tries to argue out on the same, explaining that the problem of evil does not amount to a good argument against the existence of God (Pojman & Rea, 2012). In this explanation, he makes a number of points in response to the problem of evil, which are comprehensive and deep. It is important to evaluate on Swinburne’s reply to this issue and Mackie’s discussion as well as personal position about the same.
Swinburne uses various terms throughout the discussion that he makes. Since a number of misfortunes and ills can be established in the streets where people live, religious believers are normally faced with hardships that are frequently termed as the problem of evil. There is a question of how evils could be well matched with the occurrence of an omniscient, omnipotent, as well as all-good God. A theodicist is referred to an individual that seeks to respond to this question although justification of God’s ways to men. Moreover, it happens by showing people the reason as to why things are the way they are, and particularly the reason why the things that appear as evil to people has been created or sent by God generally for the good of mankind. A small amount of evil may not do any harm to anyone, and furthermore when the greatest evil is put closely in examination tends to turn out as worth the price. This context is very important to bear in mind because it carries a lot of weight in the entire text. Swinburne in his attempt to respond to the problem of evil constructs a comprehensive explanation as to why God would enable evil to happen. He does this by dividing evil into two distinct kinds that includes the natural and moral evil, dealing with these two separately. He s...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!