Curing the Dead With Attention on the Judicial Manner in England and Wales

CURATING THE DEAD
Student's Name
Professor's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Date
Curating the Dead
Introduction
The complicated issue of "curing the dead" has captured the attention of many specialists worldwide. This pastime has unfolded to each vicinity of the globe. In recent decades, museums have progressively supplanted graves as the primary locations for showcasing deceased bodies and body components that are significant culturally or historically. In the past, cemeteries were the most frequent areas for these types of exhibits. However, due to the absence of a genuinely defined felony framework for exercising property rights in connection with people and body parts, returning human remains currently on show in museum collections can be quite challenging. These remains are on show in museums throughout the world. Because of this, the system of returning human remains currently being proven in an exhibit is rather challenging. This article focuses chiefly on the legal gadget in England and Wales as it examines the question of whether or not or not the absence of a legal framework for the exercising of property rights in admire to bodies and body parts makes it more excellent hard to reclaim human stays that are on display in museum collections. In the following essay, this paper will investigate this concern with a precise center of attention on the judicial manner in England and Wales.
The Preservation of Memorial Artifacts within Museums, Including Their Care and Upkeep
The show of human remains and different anatomical aspects in museums has been more frequent in recent years for various reasons, such as education, the advancement of scientific knowledge, and public fascination. This trend motion started in the nineteenth century and has remained popular until today (Giesen and Giesen, 2013). However, the practice of maintaining the stays of the deceased in museums raises a range of questions involving problems of ethics, morality, and the law. Whether or not human stays have to be regarded as objects or property is one of the most critical questions. Furthermore, treating human remains as if they had been inanimate objects begs the question of who owns and has authority over such remains.
Who owns the human remains saved in museums, and how do they ensure they stay below their control?
England or Wales has no well-established legal framework for exercising property rights concerning bodies and body parts. This is the case in each country. This is the modern nation of affairs in both of these countries. As a direct outcome of this, the Possession of human remains displayed in museums and the administration of those stays are constantly debated. There have been a range of controversies and challenges regarding the repatriation of human stays from museums due to the absence of a law that gives a precise definition of who owns and controls human remains (Tybjerg, 2019). This is because no legislation defines who owns and controls human remains. The absence of legislation that specifies who owns and controls human remains is the root cause of these controversies and disputes. Many museums will argue they have the felony right to show human remains because they use them for scholarly researc...