Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Life Sciences
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 19.01
Topic:

Security studies Life Sciences Coursework Research

Coursework Instructions:

Read "What Can Be Learned from the Past?" and "Soviet Deception in the Cuban Missile Crisis,"then identify any cognitive shortfalls associated with individual or group perception, memory, analysis, or biases associated with "Operation Anadyr."
-Citation Format: The Chicago Manual of Style (CMS). This includes your citations and your bibliography.
(1) employ imaginative approaches to answer the question being asked; (2) display an impressive command of the subject matter beyond the immediately obvious; (3) demonstrate a high level of critical thinking y reflection current and world views, and genuine intellectual development; and (4) excel in explaining all major points using multiple examples from the course readings or individual research.
Section I: Introduction.
(a) Clearly state the purpose of your paper along with the approach you'll be taking to answer the question. Briefly summarize the key events associated with the Cuban Missile Crisis. Summarize your introduction with a clear thesis statement.
Section II: Perceiving the build-up to and eventual crisis.
(a) Identify two specific instances where US political or military personnel mistakenly perceived the build-up to the crisis, the Soviet's ability to successfully place nuclear weapons in Cuba, and the Soviet's response to the crisis. Analyze why the perception was believed to be correct and its impact on the crisis.
(b) Identify two specific instances where US political or military personnel allowed a cognitive bias to influence their assessment/judgment in relation to the build-up to the crisis, the Soviet's ability to successfully place nuclear weapons in Cuba, and the Soviet's response to the crisis. Analyze how the bias occurred its impact on the crisis.
(c) Identify two missed indicators you think would've allowed the US to prevent the Soviets from placing weapons in Cuba. Assess why you think these indicators were missed and how they could've altered the conflict had they been collected, identified, and recognized as such.
Section III: Bibliography formatted in CMS. You must have a bibliography in addition to your citations.

Coursework Sample Content Preview:
Digging Deeper into the Cuban Missile Crisis
Name
Course
Date
Section I: Introduction
Russia remains largely a secret society to date, a trait the acquired from the USSR era. Operation Anadyr of 1962 was the level best demonstration of how secretive the USSR was, an operation that eventually ended up to be the Cuban Missile Crisis. The USSR leader Nikita Khrushchev's had learned of the U.S.’ strategic installation of missiles in Turkey in the prevailing Cold War between the country and the Soviets. The Soviet leader decided to leverage on the new ally he had found through the revolution in Cuba, Fidel Castro, who was also an enemy to the U.S. Operation Anadyr was aimed at ferrying and installing missiles in the Cuban territory, a country few miles away from the U.S.. The operation was undertaken using a strategy familiar with the Soviets, full of secrecy, denial, and deception. The U.S. was only able to detect the presence of ballistic missiles in the process of installation, courtesy of the flaws attributed to mainly Cubans. The U.S. political and military personal almost paid the price of their mistaken perception, cognitive biasness, and wrongful analysis that allowed the Soviet to successfully ferry the missiles and troops. This paper aims to unmask the several instances, where the U.S. got it all wrong in its perception of the deceptive operation from the Soviets and influences of cognitive biases on the assessment.[Paul J. Sanborn, Operation Anadyr (JSTOR, 1997).] [Central Intelligence Agency, “Soviet Deception in the Cuban Missile Crisis,” accessed November 13, 2020, /library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol46no1/article06.html.] [Central Intelligence Agency.] [Central Intelligence Agency.]
Section II: Perceiving the Build Up and the Eventual Crisis
Mistaken Perception
The U.S. got it all wrong from the onset of the operation. The Soviets had their cover well taken care of, but the U.S., with its sophistication, had every reason to uncover them but failed for quite a remarkable period due to their mistaken perception. The U.S. had prior knowledge of the existing hostility with the Cubans. The growing friendship between the Soviets and the Cubans should have alerted the U.S. political and military personnel about the crocky deals between the two nations. Besides, the Soviets and the Cubans, under the leadership of Fidel Castro, had a common enemy, the U.S., and the close relationship between the two should have alarmed the U.S. Instead, the U.S. was duped into believing that the Soviets were offering industrial and agricultural aid to the Cubans. The Soviets were cunning enough to have the military men have their cover as agricultural specialists and equipment operatives, which was rather floppy because most of them had little or no prior knowledge in their areas of specialization in the cover. Had the U.S. been keen enough to interrogate the perceived agricultural and industrial aid, they would have been in a position to uncover the operation at an early stage.[Central Intelligence Agency.] [Central Intelligence Agency.]
During the period of Operation Anadyr, the soviets had made drastic changes in their policies on interna...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to cold war:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!