Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.37
Topic:

Summary of Evaluating Science Communication by Baruch Fischhoff

Coursework Instructions:

Read this article on the Evaluation of Science Communication
This article is in typical scientific article format and includes interesting insight into how scientists should approach communicating ideas.
After you have completed the reading, prepare at least a 500 word summary of the article
Take note of the eight different sections in this article:
First Section: From "Communicating science effectively..." to the second paragraph on the second page that ends with, "... showing variants of these decisions and consultations".
Second Section: Communication Goals
Third Section: Analysis and Its Limits
Fourth Section: A Theory of Change for Science Communication
Fifth Section: One Complex Decision
Sixth Section: Staffing: Are the Right People Involved?
Seventh Section: Conclusion
For the assignment...
Start with an introductory paragraph of at least 5 sentences explain the topic and why it is important.
For the 8 sections, your summary should include paragraphs of each section must be at least 3-6 sentences. These should include an explanation of the significance from each section and several insights from each section.
1 point will be deducted for each spelling and grammar mistake so make sure to apply spell and grammar check.

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Summary of Evaluating Science Communication
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

Summary of Evaluating Science Communication
Introduction
“Evaluating Science Communication” by Baruch Fischhoff asserts that effective science communication needs to bring scientists together to make relevant decisions. Additionally, it helps to interpret or translate knowledge into meaningful terms, evaluate the process, and establish an effective two-way communication medium (Fischhoff, 2019). In particular, communicating science effectively entails the collaboration of experts from communities with distinctive practices and norms. Practitioners’ satisficing involves taking into account things that are important and accepting solutions that are imperfect. Fischhoff portrays ways in which organizations with limited expertise and resources can use science communication effectively.
The collaboration between experts involves bringing scientists who are good in different subjects and those who understand how to communicate with people. Moreover, practitioners who create trusted two-way communication media are not left out together with those who can receive and send content through these channels. Herbert Simon’s primary strategies, namely satisficing and bounded rationality are incorporated (Fischhoff, 2019). Bounded rationality entails getting the best solution in a manageable problem subset by ignoring some aspects while satisficing involves searching for an adequate solution by considering all aspects.
Communication Goals
Some communication programs are formed to change human behaviors, such as immunization and voter turnout. In some cases, the goal of these programs is not to change individuals but to empower them so that they can make informed decisions. Successful science communication enables people to change their behaviors even if they have distinctive values. The only way to the success of science communication is by evaluating whether it produces choices that are closer to the ones made by informed decision-makers.
Analysis and Its Limits
The analysis of formal decisions may ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now