Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
10 pages/≈2750 words
Sources:
5 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 58.32
Topic:

Organization And Leadership Evaluation: Leading People (Coursework Sample)

Instructions:

Title: ORGANIZATION AND LEADERSHIP EVALUATION
MANAGING ORGANIZATIONS AND LEADING PEOPLE
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
TASK OVERVIEWSUBMISSIONSSCORE REPORTS
• Competencies
• Introduction
• Requirements
• Rubric
COMPETENCIES
________________________________________
3018.1.1Practice of Management
The graduate explains the theoretical bases, current knowledge, best practices, and trends related to the practice of management.
3018.1.3Sustaining Business Performance
The graduate applies management and leadership theories for long-term global-business success.
3018.1.4Organizational Performance Methods
The graduate analyzes appropriate methods to improve organizational performance.
INTRODUCTION
________________________________________
For this task, you will write a paper on an existing organization with which you have had personal experience. The organization can be a business or a nonprofit, and you may represent any level of the organization (e.g., team, department, division, whole) in your analysis.
You will first describe the chosen organization. Your description of the organization should convey personal experience, rather than information gained from secondhand sources or media coverage. You will then perform a SWOT analysis on that organization. Last, you will analyze that organization’s leadership.
Note: Any information that would be considered confidential, proprietary, or personal in nature should not be included in the actual task submission to WGU. Do not include the actual names of people, suppliers, the organization(s), or other identifiable information. Fictional names should be used. Also, organization-specific data, including financial information, should not be included but should be addressed in a general fashion as appropriate. Work performed for clients and employers is their property and should not be used without written permission.
REQUIREMENTS
________________________________________
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Write a paper (suggested length of 10-16 pages) by doing the following:
A. Describe an existing organization with which you have had personal experience and its objective(s).
1. Describe three leadership practices of the current leader, other than yourself, in the existing organization.
Note: Leadership practices are routine actions, behaviors, functions, and responsibilities that the current leader performs.
2. Discuss how the current leader has affected organizational culture.
Note: You may represent any level of the chosen organization (e.g., team, department, division, whole) and the respective current leader in your description.
B. Conduct a SWOT analysis evaluating the chosen organization by doing the following:
1. Evaluate two of the organization’s current strengths.
2. Evaluate two of the organization’s current weaknesses.
3. Evaluate two of the organization’s current unmet opportunities.
4. Evaluate two of the organization’s current unresolved threats.
C. Conduct a leadership evaluation of the current leader discussed in part A1, using one of the scholarly leadership theories below that is different from task 1, by doing the following:
• transformational leadership
• transactional leadership
• situational leadership
• participative leadership
• servant leadership
• behavioral leadership
• trait theory of leadership
1. Evaluate three strengths of the current leader, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each strength relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of the leader’s strengths with at least one scholarly source.
2. Evaluate three weaknesses of the current leader, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each weakness relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of the leader’s weaknesses with at least one scholarly source.
3. Recommend three actionable items to improve the effectiveness of the current leader, including how each actionable item relates to the chosen scholarly leadership theory. Support the recommendations of actionable items with at least one scholarly source.
Note: A scholarly source could be a reputable journal, a published book, or any source from a university faculty member or business leader. Scholarly sources also include any article or book in the online WGU library.
D. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
RUBRIC
________________________________________
A:ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION
NOT EVIDENT
A description of an existing organization and its objective(s) is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description does not include specific details about the existing organization or its overall objective(s). COMPETENT
The description includes specific details about the existing organization and its overall objective(s).
A1:LEADERSHIP PRACTICES
NOT EVIDENT
A description of 3 leadership practices of the current leader in the existing organization is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The description does not include specific details of each of the 3 leadership practices of the current leader in the existing organization, or the current leader identified is the candidate. COMPETENT
The description includes specific details of each of the 3 leadership practices of the current leader in the existing organization, and the current leader identified is not the candidate.
A2:EFFECTS OF CURRENT LEADER ON CULTURE
NOT EVIDENT
A discussion of how the current leadership has affected organizational culture is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The discussion does not include specific details about the organization’s culture or is not supported by specific examples of the current leader’s effect on the organizational culture. COMPETENT
The discussion includes specific details about the organization’s culture and is supported by specific examples of the current leader’s effect on the organizational culture.
B1:CURRENT STRENGTHS
NOT EVIDENT
An evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current strengths is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current strengths does not include specific details, or the strengths identified do not have a positive impact on the organization. COMPETENT
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current strengths includes specific details, and the strengths identified have a positive impact on the organization.
B2:CURRENT WEAKNESSES
NOT EVIDENT
An evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current weaknesses is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current weaknesses does not include specific details, or the weaknesses identified do not have a negative impact on the organization. COMPETENT
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current weaknesses includes specific details, and the weaknesses identified have a negative impact on the organization.
B3:CURRENT OPPORTUNITIES
NOT EVIDENT
An evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current unmet opportunities is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current unmet opportunities does not include specific details, or the opportunities identified do not have the potential to benefit the organization. COMPETENT
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current unmet opportunities includes specific details, and the opportunities identified have the potential to benefit the organization.
B4:CURRENT THREATS
NOT EVIDENT
An evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current unresolved threats is not provided. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current unresolved threats does not include specific details, or the threats identified do not have the potential to threaten the organization. COMPETENT
The evaluation of 2 of the organization’s current unresolved threats includes specific details, and the threats identified have the potential to threaten the organization.
C1:STRENGTHS OF THE CURRENT LEADER
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not evaluate 3 strengths of the current leader. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission evaluates 3 strengths of the current leader, but the evaluation does not use the chosen scholarly leadership theory or does not include specific details of each strength or specific examples to support how each strength relates to the chosen theory. Or the evaluation is not supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. COMPETENT
The submission evaluates 3 strengths of the current leader using the chosen scholarly leadership theory and includes specific details of each strength and specific examples to support how each strength relates to the chosen theory. The evaluation is supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source.
C2:WEAKNESSES OF THE CURRENT LEADER
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not evaluate 3 weaknesses of the current leader. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission evaluates 3 weaknesses of the current leader, but the evaluation does not use the chosen scholarly leadership theory or does not include specific details of each weakness or specific examples to support how each weakness relates to the chosen theory. Or the evaluation is not supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. COMPETENT
The submission evaluates 3 weaknesses of the current leader using the chosen scholarly leadership theory and includes specific details of each weakness and specific examples to support how each weakness relates to the chosen theory. The evaluation is supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source.
C3:RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CURRENT LEADER
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not recommend 3 actionable items to improve the current leader’s effectiveness. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission recommends 3 actionable items to improve the current leader’s effectiveness, but the recommendations do not align to the chosen scholarly leadership theory or do not include specific examples to support how each actionable item relates to the chosen theory. Or the recommendations are not supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source. COMPETENT
The submission recommends 3 actionable items to improve the current leader’s effectiveness, and the recommendations align to the chosen scholarly leadership theory and include specific examples to support how each actionable item relates to the chosen theory. The recommendations are supported by at least 1 appropriate scholarly source.
D:APA SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. COMPETENT
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.
E:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. COMPETENT
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

source..
Content:

Organization and Leadership Evaluation
Introduction
Honeywell International Inc. is an American multinational company that deals with the production of different commercial as well as consumer products including services that relates to engineering and aerospace systems. Honeywell operates four strategic business units globally with its headquarter in Morris Plains in New Jersey and a workforce estimated at over 130,000. The current chief executive officer and the leader of the company is Darius Adamczyk. There are many brands associated with Honeywell that commercial, as well as retail consumers, recognize. The company also produces other products besides consumer home products such as sensors, air cleaners as well as sensors and security alarms (Honeywell Inc., 2018).
Moreover, the level of growth within the company calls for focus on the application of excellence from every employee including the management team. However, the management should exercise some level of power and network within the organizational work ethics. This calls for consideration on the process of influence that emanates from leaders as well as followers. The collaboration between the two parties has the capability of influencing the company’s productivity. This includes the achievement of set goals and objectives. The nature of influence provides a good essence of measuring leadership quality since it directly organizational performance as well as success in a career. There is a vital role that power plays since it involves the achievement of influence over other company concepts. Power, in this case, refers to the leader’s potential influence on their followers. It is usually based on certain qualities and often thrives out of relationships resulting from different transactions (Lussier and Achua, 2010).
Three leadership practices of the current organization
The CEO’s experience in leadership focuses on the different categories of employee behaviors within the system that relates to boosting self-esteem. Such leadership trait is very much essential especially to those with low levels of neuroticism. In the CEO’s case, there are less neurotic experiences involved since most of his leadership performances is evidently based on company interest as well as adequate preparation through the education system. The aspect on the effective supervisory role as exhibited in the company is not a requirement from those having high-level neuroticism that eventually requires a higher order of leadership to ensure victory (McKee et al., 345). The aspect of collaborative personality is an added strength owing to the capability of the CEO in identifying with different groups.
The CEO also focused on the reconciliation of control and autonomy. Such practice has enabled the inclination towards employee choice as opposed to the voice of the employee. In this case, the principle of empowerment that the CEO applies enables the aspect of influencing the level as well as the nature of responsibilities as given to the followers. The CEO has also focused on employee empowerment which guarantees discretion to the leadership style as applied. Such moves enable sudden satisfaction of some of the hidden employee needs. The CEO looks at employee empowerment to entail such aspects as effectiveness in administration. Therefore, the practice on empowerment involves consideration on reinforcing employee skill ahead employee recruitment since it helps in the utilization of appropriate, responsible as well as acceptable skills (Laureani and Antony, 2019).
How current leadership has affected the organization culture
The current CEO has enabled the company to develop itself to the point of significantly outperforming other peer companies since he took over the leadership. For in...

Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • The Role Of Ethics And Social Responsibility
    Description: Ethics relate to the values ​​that are reflected in business culture as the norms and principles, guiding employees' behavior and decision making of the organizations, create their codes of ethics....
    2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Management | Coursework |
  • General Motors Analysis: Change Management
    Description: This paper analyses how change management, as well as other factors, including motivating employees, performance monitoring, communication of change process, managing employee engagement, education and equipment, and avoidance of micromanagement, can help GM retain or improve the loyalty of its employees....
    4 pages/≈1100 words | 6 Sources | APA | Management | Coursework |
  • HRMD 610 Week 11 Assignment 3
    Description: HRMD 610 Week 11 Assignment 3 Management Coursework...
    4 pages/≈1100 words | 4 Sources | APA | Management | Coursework |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!