Nurse Educator Competency: Engage in Scholarship of Teaching

I am submitting this assignment to you per your request, especially since you completed the last NEPD Goal Form Competency 6. I am attaching the blank form for you to complete Competency 7. Please remember to follow the format of the form, no double spacing. Please only 2 SMART goals utilizing each letter. The reflection should be no more than 2 short paragraphs. Citations are not necessary unless you choose to use them, if so, no more than 2. I have all faith in your perfecting this project, it is just the professor is so strict on what is expected. Attached is the form you will need to use for Competency 7 as well as Competency 5, to use as a reference for format. I have paid for 3 pages, if you require more, I will pay. If any changes are necessary, I will keep you informed. Here is wishing for you to have a Happy Healthy Prosperous New Year, 2023.

Assessment Description

The "Nursing Education Practicum Documentation (NEPD) Forms" provide weekly, competency-based documentation of clinical practicum activities and are utilized by learners to communicate practicum experiences to course faculty. Be sure to read the instructions on the form for information on how to complete the assignment before you begin.

Using the "Nursing Education Practicum Documentation (NEPD) Form: Competency 7," write goals for what you will accomplish in this topic and how you will evaluate your accomplishments. The NEPD form uses the nursing process and follows the format of a nursing care plan, so this should be familiar to you.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

NUR-665E-RS-NEPD Form-Competency7-Topic 14.docx

Rubric Criteria

Learning Goals

1.6 points

Criteria Description

At least one learning goal for the assigned competency is written in the S.M.A.R.T. format.



5. Target

1.6 points

At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is thoroughly developed.



4. Acceptable

1.47 points

At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is well developed.



3. Approaching

1.41 points

At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is present.



2. Insufficient

1.28 points

At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Learning goals are not present.





Resources and Strategies

1.6 points

Criteria Description

Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are provided.



5. Target

1.6 points

Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are thoroughly developed.



4. Acceptable

1.47 points

Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are well-developed.



3. Approaching

1.41 points

Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are present.



2. Insufficient

1.28 points

Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals lack details or are incomplete.



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are not present.





Measurement

1.6 points

Criteria Description

How the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used are described.



5. Target

1.6 points

A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is thoroughly developed.



4. Acceptable

1.47 points

A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is well-developed.



3. Approaching

1.41 points

A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is present.



2. Insufficient

1.28 points

A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used lacks detail or is incomplete.



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is not present.





Evaluation

1.6 points

Criteria Description

The accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is described.



5. Target

1.6 points

A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is thoroughly developed.



4. Acceptable

1.47 points

A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is well-developed.



3. Approaching

1.41 points

A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is present.



2. Insufficient

1.28 points

A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals lacks detail or is incomplete.



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is not present.





Competency Reflection

1.6 points

Criteria Description

Competency analysis of practicum experience and the connection between the competency and practicum experience is provided.



5. Target

1.6 points

Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is thoroughly developed.



4. Acceptable

1.47 points

Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is well-developed.



3. Approaching

1.41 points

Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is present.



2. Insufficient

1.28 points

Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is lacks detail or is incomplete.



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Competency analysis of practicum experience and the connection between the competency and practicum experience is not present.





Clinical Hours

1 points

Criteria Description

Clinical hours completed for the topic and total-to-date are documented.



5. Target

1 points

The clinical hours completed for the topic and total-to-date are present.



4. Acceptable

0.92 points

N/A



3. Approaching

0.88 points

N/A



2. Insufficient

0.8 points

N/A



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The clinical hours completed for the topic and total-to-date are not present.





Mechanics of Writing

0.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.



5. Target

0.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.



4. Acceptable

0.46 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.



3. Approaching

0.44 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.



2. Insufficient

0.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.





Format/Documentation

0.5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.



5. Target

0.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.



4. Acceptable

0.46 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.



3. Approaching

0.44 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.



2. Insufficient

0.4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.



1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.