Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
APA
Subject:
Accounting, Finance, SPSS
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 6.32
Topic:

Risk/Return Relationship And Cost Of Capital

Coursework Instructions:

Describe the logic underlying the use of target weights to calculate the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and compare this approach with the use of historical weights. Which is the preferred weighting scheme and why? Support your rationale with at least one citation from the literature. Reference and Cite needed

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Risk/Returns Relationship and Cost of Capital
Student’s name
Institutional Affiliation
Instructor’s Name
Course
Date
Risk/Returns Relationship and Cost of Capital
Primarily, there is a need to understand the two concepts of Target Weights and Historical Weights. Target Weights are market value or book weights obtained through capital structure proportions (Ortiz, 2021). On the other hand, Historical Weights are also market value or book weights whose foundation is the propositions of actual capital structure.
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) provides the criterion for a company to establish all the campaniles capital sources, which range from long-term debt, bonds to stocks (Ortiz, 2021). The WACC formulation was based on the concept that an increase in capital results in a corresponding increase in the risk. Equally, when the capital invested reduces, the risk is also relatively low (Ortiz, 2021). In my understanding, I can use an analogy of the funnel to explain the logic applied in using Target Weights in calculating the WACC. When the funnel remains full sustainably, it symbolizes a healthy business organization whereby ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to relationship:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!