Business Law 119 Law Case Study Research Paper Essay

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
CHAPTER 12
Question One
Unilateral contracts require that certain conditions are met to give a certain product. In this case, Marsha was the first in the line as a condition to buy the coat at $500; then, as a judge, I would rule the case in favor of Marsha based on that condition.
Question Three
When an offer is set, it remains open until when the recipient has accepted it. In this case, Katherine had revoked the offer because the recipient Paul had not accepted or rejected it at the time of the second revocation email.
Question Four
Typically, the law of contract is based on the offer and acceptance principle. In this case, one party extended an offer, but it lacked acceptance. Therefore, I would rule in favor of the baker. Besides, the contract lacked honesty, and Nelson's filing was based on malice.
Question Six
The company is liable for false advertisement; the court cannot justify if the advert was due to recklessness or deliberate manipulation of buyers. Therefore, I would decide the case in favor of the complainant.
In this case, I would rule in favor of the Papa because based on the initial agreement of intent, the only condition for not paying the pledge would be death, and in this case, it had not occurred.
Question Nine
Zehmers are not correct; there is a contract because it fulfills the elements of a valid contract. There were offer and acceptance, legal objects and capacity of the parties, and consideration. And thus, it is a voidable contract altogether.
CHAPTER 13
Question One
Fraud is constituted when knowingly a salesperson fails to disclose the truth about a property. In this case, the salesman did not commit a crime because he was not aware of the automobile being a wreck before.
Question Two
A minor under the age of 18 years lacks the legal capacity to enter into a contract; however, in the event where he/she lies of her age and enters into a contract, the case is considered void. In this case, Helen cannot demand damages because the motorbike is damaged, and she lied.
Question Three
When someone uses threats or psychological pressure to enter into a contract, that contract is null and void because the ...