3 pages/≈825 words
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (Case Study Sample)
Read the Application Case 15-1 on pages 503-505 of the textbook. *****[Ivancevich, J. M. (2010). Human resource management (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.]***** Answer the following questions based on your reading of the case and the material in Chapter 15. Your response should be at least 3 pages in length, and you should cite references relied upon for your answers. All references should be cited according to APA guidelines, including the textbook. a. Evaluate the various claims made by the union and counterclaims made by the company regarding the charges of unfair labor practices. Which of the arguments are most persuasive? b. Was the statement by Nord to Snow on the date of the representational election a threat or a legitimate prediction and personal opinion protected by the free speech provisions of the act? Why, or why not? c. Was the company obligated to accept the union's majority status claim on the basis of the authorization cards submitted by the union? Explain your answer. d. If the company is found to have violated the act, what would be the appropriate remedy: a bargaining order or a new election? Explain your answer. source..
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Student Name School Name Human Resource Management From the claims made by both the union and the company l believe that the union had a stronger case than the company since some of the claims they had against the company were in line with the LMRA act under the section of unfair labor practices section 8(a). They claimed the following had been done: The company repeatedly interrogated the employees concerning their union activities; this is evidenced in the case when the company’s maintenance supervisor talked to some o the employees asking them about the union’s visit. He telephoned George Thompson, talked to Alice Coleman; he interrogated Theo Ewing and also Gloria Greer. While doing this he violated the National Labor Relations Act Section 8(a) (1). Which states it shall be an unfair labor practice for an employer “to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed by section 7” (Fortado, n.d) The supervisor also threatened Mr. Theo Ewing that he had everything because he had given him and that he had the last chance to tell him what was happening with the union. The threatening of employees is also evidenced when the new supervisor Leo Nord told Cecil Snow on the day o the elections that if the union won then the employer would take away the free rent apartments from the janitor’s help and charge the head janitor “for the second bedroom in their apartments.” (Ivancevich, 2010, p.21). The employers also promised the employees that it was going to improve their sickness and health benefit...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
- Child Development Case StudyDescription: Undergraduate writing level 7 pages Social Sciences Format Style English (U.S.) Case Study. Child Development Case Study...7 pages/≈1925 words | 1 Source | APA | Social Sciences | Case Study |
- THE POST-FALL OF GADDAFI AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE REGIONDescription: Social Sciences Case Study: THE POST-FALL OF GADDAFI AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE REGION...5 pages/≈1375 words | 8 Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Case Study |
- Regulation of Genome TestingDescription: Social Sciences Case Study: Regulation of Genome Testing...1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Social Sciences | Case Study |