Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:

ENGL135 Peer Review Worksheet. DeWayne Ruff. Literature & Language Case Study

Case Study Instructions:

ENGL135 Peer Review Worksheet
INSTRUCTIONS: Peer Reviews will be conducted in class discussion forums during Week 6. Be sure to review the lesson and the Discussion area for additional details and guidance. Please complete the following steps below, returning a separate peer review worksheet for each of the two classmates whose papers you review.
This assignment is worth 100 points.
• You will receive 20 points for submitting your draft by the required Tuesday deadline.
• You will receive 40 points for each peer review worksheet you submit for your peers by the Friday deadline (40 points x 2 reviews = 80 points total).
Step 1: Post your Commentary draft in your assigned peer review group no later than Tuesday night at midnight MT. Hit Respond after the peer review directions and attach your essay as a .docx file. In your post, feel free to include any information you would like to share with your peers, such as areas you are struggling with or specific feedback you would like to receive.
Step 2: Find the two classmates who have posted their drafts after you (in terms of time) and download their essays.
Step 3: Read each essay and respond to the questions below. Please respond directly on this peer review worksheet, using a separate worksheet for each draft you review.
Step 4: Save each worksheet with your last name and the last name of your peer with the word Review separating the names (e.g., JohnsonReviewTurner). Go back to the individual peer’s post that included his or her draft, hit Respond, and attach your completed peer review worksheet. In your post, provide any additional details or information you would like to share that may not have been covered in the worksheet. Complete this step no later than Friday at midnight MT.
Step 5: After the Friday deadline, check back to your peer review group to find your peers’ review of your essay. Each student should receive two peer reviews.
WORKSHEET: Please reply to each question below, writing in complete sentences and providing justification or explanation for each response.
1. Does the writer catch your attention and clearly convey a clear purpose in the introduction? If so, what strategies did he or she use to accomplish this? If not, what suggestions can you provide to strengthen the introduction and clarify the purpose?
2. What is the writer’s thesis? What is the counterargument? What suggestions can you offer for improving the wording of the thesis?
3. What type of support does the writer use? Does this support help to prove the thesis statement? Is research integrated effectively with author tags and effective summaries, paraphrase, or direct quotes? Is the information presented logical and is it explained well? What suggestions can you offer the writer in terms of improving depth of information or presentation of research?
4. Is the paper organized effectively? Does the writer cover one point fully before moving on to the next? Are topic sentences and transitions used to deliver the paper in a coherent manner? What suggestions can you offer to increase organization and structure?
5. How would you describe the style, tone, and word choice used? What strategies does the writer use to connect with the audience? In what ways could the writer better meet the audience’s needs?
6. What are the three most important revisions the writer could make to improve the essay?

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Peer Review
Name
Affiliation
Course
Tutor
Peer Review
DeWayne Ruff
The writer catches the attention of readers by indicating the topic question on whether or not technology involving developments like robots and AI is benefiting human beings. Readers get the idea of what to expect through the work in the description of the chosen stance. This part shows the difference between the past and how technology has impacted humans, especially in the workplace.
The thesis, “My thesis point of view is that robot and AI are necessary to help humans and not look like them as and our enemy, we have to look them like a helper to humans" shows the support on the benefits of technology. On the counterargument, the writer explains the disadvantages of the innovation.
Although the writer makes many arguments to support the topic, the work is not well organized, and one would wonder what to expect in the next paragraph since the points in the content are split on the entire job.
The paper is not well-organized. First, the thesis is placed in the article, and it should appear as the last sentence of the first paragraph. Also, the script is unorganized, and readers would even think the writer is not in support of the thesis. I would recommend for the writer to arrange the work logically in the order; introduction, paragraphs with points in support of the chosen stance, counterargument, and conclusion.
Although the writer has tried to give excellent content on the topic, the work has many grammatical errors. I would agree with the fact that most readers would not even understand most of the sentences at work. The description is focused on the topic, but it does not attain the expected levels.
The wr...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to language essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now