Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.4
Topic:

Case Analysis. Accounting, Finance, Management, and marketing.

Case Study Instructions:

Instructions


 This analysis paper involves a case analysis.  You must first choose the case you wish to analyze.  You can find the cases on our Canvas site, under AP cases.


     The cases involve one of four business areas: accounting, finance, management, and marketing.  You are free to choose any case you wish, though you may wish to narrow it down by first selecting a business area.  Within each area, read through the cases (they are around 1 page) and pick the one that most interests you.  Each case presents an ethical dilemma. If you’re not sure you understand the dilemma in the case you choose, please contact me.


     Your paper should be divided into 3 separate sections as discussed below.  Submit your paper through Canvas.  Please put your last name in the document title when submitting.  Also please submit your paper using Word (doc. Format).  Please don’t submit your paper in a PDF or another format as Canvas won’t accept it.


 


Section I.     Each case ends with a decision to be made.  First, putting yourself in the role of the person making the decision, indicate your key decision options.  What basic choices do you have?  In stating your decision options please avoid imagining a solution that would solve the ethical issue in the case, as the purpose of this case is to assess your ability to apply accurately the ethical perspectives. Second, do a stakeholder analysis that lists the stakeholders to the decision, and include an explanation of how the decision would affect each stakeholder. 


            Note: Do not summarize the case in your paper unless you wish to make some additional assumptions.  Assume the reader knows the content of your case.


 


Section II.     Analyze your decision options from an ethical standpoint. To do this, apply each of three main perspectives discussed in the course for making an ethical decision: utilitarianism, and universalism (Kant).  You are free (and encouraged) to apply others discussed as well; although apply at these. Indicate what each perspective would say is the ethical course of action, and why.  Be sure to refer back to your stakeholder analysis when discussing the utilitarian decision in the case.


     Please subdivide this section into 2 subsections – first, discuss what utilitarianism would say is the most ethical choice.  Second, discuss what universalism (Kant) would say is the most ethical choice. 


 


Section III.  Indicate which of your decision options presented in Section I you would choose, and the degree to which it is consistent with each ethical perspective.  Be as detailed in possible in describing the decision you would make and/or the action(s) you would take.  If one or more of the perspectives disagrees with your decision, indicate why you do not choose to follow the guidance of that perspective(s).  Say what is wrong with the perspective for you, either in the context of the decision, and/or for you in general. 


 


Suggested length: Approximately 3-5 double-spaced pages, normal sized font and margins, though your paper can be as long or short as you like.  However it will be difficult to present an analysis of sufficient depth in less than 5 pages. Also, please put the case name at the top of your case analysis.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Case Analysis
Name
Affiliation
Course
Tutor
Case Analysis
Section I
The credit officer at Diversified Consolidated Corporation (DCC) has a tough choice to make about the financial condition of North Manufacturing. Kylia has several options to choose between to arrive at a significant decision. The officer may decide to keep the financial status of North Manufacturing from Mike, the officer from the credit department of Basic products. In this case, the company in trouble will get some supplies and escape the risk of bankruptcy. DCC will also get into a better position of continuous payment from North Manufacturing. On the other hand, Kylia can choose to tell Mike the truth about the critical condition of the company's financial status. If the supplier knows the truth, the firm will not get the goods ordered, and this incident will render the North Manufacturing a bad situation in terms of business operations. The company will also delay its subsequent payments to DCC. The credit officer has to think about the right decision to make to avoid severe repercussions on the key stakeholders involved.
As a critical stakeholder, Kylia Ryan may face severe consequences if the wrong option gets down for action. If the credit status of North Manufacturing gets worse than the prevailing circumstance, the officer will lose all her bonus compensations. Besides, she will also lose the open chances for promotion, and worst of all, she could lose her job for going against the company rules and regulations. Scott, the treasure at North, will get into trouble if the company loses all investments. As the officer in the department, he should come up with the best ways to avoid the bankruptcy of the firm. Mike Walman will get into trouble for compromising the fact that the company requesting for supplies is not in the best financial situation. Mike will also fall victim to depending on Kylia as the only source of information at the expense of following the right criteria. The Basic Products Company will get into high risk of incurring losses in case the firm doesn't pay for the supplies. The credit managers will fall into the trouble of duty negligence if the decision made affects the company negatively.
Section II
Utilitarianism perspective majors on the happiness of the significant number of population. The implementation of Unitarianism may hurt some minors will trying to please or achieve the satisfaction of the majority, since joy is a virtue that affects the soul directly. While the perspective focuses on the happiness and the effects of a decision on the people involved, deontology insists that some morals should never get broken despite the situation in question. In most cases, utilitarianism does not consider breaking some morals while implementing the ultimate decision in an ethical dilemma (Brink, 2007). This perspective values the happiness and the consequences of everyone involved in the situation. The considered population beholds the same level of joy. Deontology gives two options in the decision-making process. Irrational beings will choose an option because they will gain further benefits from the decision achieved. On the other hand, rational individuals make the right decision regardless of what they may want ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now