Internal Memo Recreations Sports Ventures Law Case Study

Internal Memo
Student’s Name
Institution
Course
INTERNAL MEMO
Recreations Sports Ventures
REF NO: 10/2018
TO: B.E
FROM: The Manager (Recreations Sports Venture)
DATE
SUBJECT: THE OHIO LAW THAT IS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT COLUMBUS CREW SC FROM LEAVING OHIO, COLUMBUS.
Recently the Columbus Crew SC is planning to leave Columbus and this might cause the company to lose significant revenue. The manager at Recreations sports Ventures, a Columbus, Ohio based sporting organization is in charge of laying off people in the company who are affected to leave the Columbus. The case was filled at Franklin County, Ohio concerning the Crew SC’s potential move (O'Bannon, McCann, & Schaap, 2018). Part A represents the Columbus Organization (plaintiff) and Party B is the Columbus Crew SC (Defendant) and they will progress to the United States District Court. Civil cases in the district court are governed by the Federal Rules of the civil procedures through the significant constitutional amendments in 2007. All states have similar laws in the State court systems. According to Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, both parties and the court should administer and construe this rule in order to make the case speedy, inexpensive and just.
The lawyer for the team said during the hearing at Franklin County Common Pleas Court that allowing Columbus Crew SC leave might disappoint the fans but there were other things at stake, Bradley Ruskin who was representing the Major League Soccer said that it was a prosecution of the constitution to allow the team to move to Austin Texas. He said the relocation of the club is not the first choice and people were upset, but that did not give any credit to allow the state to keep the defendant from relocating. The lawyers presented their arguments for two hours but Judge Jeffrey Brown did not make any ruling. He concluded that take the arguments under the advertisements with a decision that was written as soon as it was practical. There are two possibilities, that id the judge will either discard the case or mot it to the trial stage during the hearing the attorneys argue on the real owners of the team. The law states that when the owners of a team make the decision of moving the team to another city, then they must issue a notice at least six months and give the local community the opportunity to purchase the team. The team argued that the Modell Law did not apply because they did not use tax-supported facilities for their home games and that they did not receive any financial support from the federal government. Ruskin said that the purpose of the constitution was to ensure there is a free flow of goods between different states in the country
The following are some of the constitutional issues were raised in the pleadings,
The Journal covers constitutional issues in Chapter 1 on page 5 Rule 8 on the general rules of pleading (Hillel, 2011). The Organization issued a short claim of relief. According to the constitution, the pleader is entitled to relief.
Also on the same journal Chapter 1 page 6 Rule 9 (b) on pleading special matters elaborates more on fraud or mistake (Hillel, 2011). This was another issue that was raised d...