Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Case Brief Assignment 1: Marybeth Atkins v. Jiminy Peak Inc

Case Study Instructions:

Go over the 2 cases (Marybeth Atkins V. Jiminy Peak, Inc) (Robert L. Martin V. Angeline Caudell Glass) .
What needs to be written for each case:
Facts: Paragraph
Issue: 1-3 Sentences
Holding: 2-4 Sentences

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Case Brief
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Case Brief
Case 1: Marybeth Atkins V. Jiminy Peak, Inc.
Facts
On December 5th, 1984, Marybeth Atkins (plaintiff) sued Jiminy Peak, Inc. (defendant) for serious injuries, obtained on 20th March 192 at a ski resort owned by the defendant. Marybeth Atkins seriously injured her leg, when she was using ski's bindings hired from a shop in the same resort. Plaintiff Marybeth Atkins stated that the reason and cause of her severely broken leg were the ski equipment she hired that it was defective (Marybeth Atkins v. Jiminy Peak, Inc, 1987). Marybeth claimed that the improperly or ineffectively conditioned equipment caused all her problems. Therefore, this issue of the equipment being improperly inspected and the negligence of the owner resulted in the breach of contract. On the other hand, Jiminy Peak (defendant), documented for a summary judgment as a subject of the premises that the plaintiff was prevented from the activity according to a one-year statute of limitations. G.L.c 143, S71P is the statute and is the primary rule in question, which leaves an open space for more interpretation (Marybeth Atkins v. Jiminy Peak, Inc, 1987). However, Marybeth Atkins (plaintiff) insisted that the statute should be interpreted as exercising a sovereign authority to any purposes based on Jiminy peak's area of duties. Violation of those rules stated by G.L.c section 71N, that explicitly requires ski places to be well serviced and to perform its work in a reasonably safe manner. This case was later moved to the Massachusetts's Supreme Court.
Issues
Are all assertions of recklessness, breach of warranty and contract by the wounded skier against a ski place operator prevented by G.L.c 143, 71P a one-year statute of limitations provided? Was there a favor given to a ski area operator by the Supreme Court judgment?
Holding
The statute of limitation G.L.c 143 71P, governs all the activities done by the wounded skier in protection from s...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!