Defamation Laws: Ruin Of Reputation In Social Media (Case Study Sample)
1. Place yourself in the position of the attorney for Mr. Hollis, the plaintiff. Discuss all possible laws (i.e., legal grounds) that would support a conclusion that Mr. Hollis should win the case and explain your reasons. The reasons you state should be based on the law. (This could take 1000 – 1400 words, approximately the length of the above description of the case)
2. Place yourself in the position of the attorney for Ms. Joseph, defendant and owner-operator of the website. Discuss all possible laws (i.e., legal grounds) that would support a conclusion that Ms. Joseph should win the case and explain your reasons. The reasons you state should be based on the law. (This could take 1000 – 1400 words, approximately the length of the above description of the case)
3. Place yourself in the position of the attorney for the two women who are being sued for posting alleged false comments about Mr. Harris. Discuss all possible laws (i.e., legal grounds) that would support a conclusion that these two women should win the case and explain your reasons. The reasons you state should be based on the law. (This could take 1000 – 1400 words, approximately the length of the above description of the case)
Note: Be sure to avoid plagiarism, which is in violation of the School of Business' integrity policy. You are encouraged to use your textbook for research and to cite information from your course textbook. If you include in your paper any works, thoughts, ideas, sentences, etc. that belong to or were originated by others, you must cite the sources from which you obtain such information. Please use the APA-style citation.
1 Mr. Hollis can file a case against Tasha Joseph and the person who sent the information because the information was highly defaming and thus ruined his reputation. According to Code Anno., § 45-8-212 Criminal defamation, defamation occurs when there is anything that exposes an individual or a group of people, class and association to feelings of hatred, being ridiculed, if the remarks are degrading and positions the victim to disgrace in the society. The same law continues to note that the law applies whether the remarks were written, orally spoken or communicated through electronic means as defined by 45-8-213. This subsection also informs that if the defaming statements were passed to the third party without the consent of the person defamed should be treated as a criminal offense and the person who committed this offence can be sentenced to prison for a maximum of six months or should be made to pay a fine of a maximum of 500 dollars. If the plaintiff proves that these claims caused him damages or even affect his employment, he may win his case. These statements said on Joseph's platform were defaming as they hurt his reputation. Defamation laws were published to protect the reputations of people and entities like businesses. In this case, the statement is a libel because the slander was written and posted on a social media platform. As a requirement, Hollis needs to prove that Ms. Joseph and the user of Joseph's website made defaming false accusations against the plaintiff and that Tasha Joseph who is the host of the site provided unprivileged publication to the user. Hollis should also prove that Tasha Josephs acted negligently and published the false accusations which ruined his reputation and then provide proof of the damages caused as a result of the statements posted. According to the American restatement of torts, these statements were defaming because they exposed the plaintiff to ridicule, it reflected negativity and caused the plaintiff mental suffering. On the plaintiff's character, the statements compromised the level of the Plaintiff's morality and integrity, and that the published claims could have caused the plaintiff psychological suffering because others did not want to associate with him.
Since this case is a libel, Hollis must produce the published defamatory information which affected him. This is to prove that the statement was communicated and the people this message was addressed to understood the message. Also according to “the restatement “communication is an exchange of information where the recipient correctly or mistakably understands its content. When dealing with this case, the court will also consider associated facts and the availed circumstances to determine the meaning of the statements published on that site to consider if indeed they are defaming or not. Hollis will also have to prove that whatever was published on the website referred to him. It is not even necessary that the communication referred to the plaintiff by name, so long as, even the recipient of the information mistakenly believed that the information related to Mr. Hollis and that the belief is reasonable, Hollis can file a successful case against Tasha and the user of the website. Also, freedom of speech is not applicable in all situations because the remarks put forward by the third-party on Tasha's website were highly damaging especially to his reputation and could have remarkably affected his wellbeing. Once this statement was made to the public, the remarks will stay in the minds of the recipients for a very long time, and all this time, the life of the plaintiff will be negatively affected. The statements that were communicated by the third party can be classified in the Slander per se claim...
- LAW CASE STUDY and 3 QuestionsDescription: Undergraduate writing level 1 page Law Format Style English (U.S.) Case Study. LAW CASE STUDY and 3 Questions...1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | APA | Law | Case Study |
- Maryland v. PringleDescription: Maryland v. Pringle Law Case Study...2 pages/≈550 words | 1 Source | APA | Law | Case Study |
- Business Law: Risk of Loss All America Export-Import CorpDescription: Undergraduate Case Study: Risk of Loss All America Export-Import Corp...1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Law | Case Study |