Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
15 pages/β‰ˆ4125 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 64.8
Topic:

Business Law: Case Study Applications Case Study Analyses Law Paper

Case Study Instructions:

BUS 206 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Business law impacts our everyday lives, both personally and professionally. Businesses enter contracts, manufacture goods, sell services and products, and engage in employment and labor practices—activities that must all adhere to certain laws and regulations. Recognizing and evaluating legal issues is a fundamental skill that will help you navigate commercial relationships and avoid potential problems in the business world.
The final assessment for this course will require you to analyze three case studies and produce a short report for each. You will apply your legal knowledge and your understanding of the types of business organizations. The project is divided into three milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three, Five, and Six. The final project will be submitted in Module Seven.
This assessment addresses the following course outcomes:
• Apply appropriate elements of the U.S. legal system and the U.S. Constitution to business scenarios for impacting decisions in authentic situations
• Apply concepts of ethics, morality, and civil and criminal law to business scenarios for informed corporate decision making
• Analyze the basic elements of a contract and a quasi-contract for their application to commercial and real estate scenarios
• Differentiate between the various types of business organizations for informing rights and responsibilities
Prompt
Imagine yourself as a paralegal working in a law office that has been tasked with reviewing three current cases. You will review the case studies and compose a short report for each, applying your legal knowledge and understanding of the types of business organizations. In each of the three reports, you will focus on areas of law covered in this course. Case Study One focuses on the legal system, criminal law, and ethics. Case Study Two concentrates on contracts and landlord-tenant law. Case Study Three involves environmental law and business organizations.
Case Study One
Chris, Matt, and Ian, who live in California, have decided to start a business selling an aftershave lotion called Funny Face over the internet. They contract with Novelty Now Inc., a company based in Florida, to manufacture and distribute the product. Chris frequently meets with a representative from Novelty Now to design the product and to plan marketing and distribution strategies. In fact, to increase the profit margin, Chris directs Novelty Now to substitute PYR (a low-cost chemical emulsifier) for the compound in Novelty Now’s original formula. PYR is not FDA approved. Funny Face is marketed nationally on the radio and innewspapers, as well as on the web and Facebook. Donald Margolin, a successful CEO and public speaker, buys one bottle of Funny Face over the internet. After he uses it once, his face turns a permanent shade of blue. Donald Margolin and his company, Donald Margolin Empire Inc., file suit in the state of New York against Novelty Now Inc. and Chris, Matt, and Ian, alleging negligence and seeking medical costs and compensation for the damage to his face and business reputation. It is discovered that PYR caused Margolin’s skin discoloration. The website for Funny Face states that anyone buying their product cannot take Chris, Matt, and Ian to court. Novelty Now’s contract with the three men states that all disputes must be brought in the state of Florida.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
A. Apply the rules of jurisdiction to the facts of this case and determine what jurisdiction(s) would be appropriate for Margolin’s lawsuit against Funny Face and Novelty Now, respectively. Consider federal court, state court, and long arm principles in your analysis.
B. Assume all parties agree to pursue alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of two types of ADR appropriate for this case. Be sure to define the characteristics of each in your answer.
C. Applying what you have learned about ADR, which type would each party (Funny Face, Novelty Now, and Margolin) prefer and why?
D. Apply concepts of criminal law and discuss whether or not corporations and/or corporate officers may be held liable for criminal acts.
E. Identify, per the classification of crimes in the text, any potential criminal acts by Funny Face and/or Novelty Now.
F. Assume the use of the emulsifier PYR, at the direction of Chris, is a criminal offense. Apply concepts of criminal law and discuss the potential criminal liability of Funny Face, Chris, Matt, Ian, and Novelty Now. Include support for your conclusion.
G. Apply at least three guidelines of ethical decision-making to evaluate ethical issues within the case study.
Case Study Two
Sam Stevens lives in an apartment building where he has been working on his new invention, a machine that plays the sound of a barking dog to scare off potential intruders. A national chain store that sells safety products wants to sell Sam’s product exclusively. Although Sam and the chain store never signed a contract, Sam verbally told a store manager several months ago that he would ship 1,000 units.
Sam comes home from work one day and finds two letters in his mailbox. One is an eviction notice from his landlord, Quinn, telling him he has to be out of the apartment in 30 days because his barking device has been bothering the other tenants. It also states that Sam was not allowed to conduct a business from his apartment. Sam is angry because he specifically told Quinn that he was working on a new invention, and Quinn had wished him luck. The second letter is from the chain store, demanding that Sam deliver the promised 1,000 units immediately.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
A. Analyze the elements of this case to determine whether a valid contract exists between Sam and the chain store. Support your response by identifying the elements of a valid contract in your analysis.
B. Assume there is not a valid contract between Sam and the chain store. Analyze the elements of a quasi-contract and a promissory estoppel to determine whether the chain store would prevail on a claim of either. Why or why not? Include support for your analysis.
C. Identify the rights and obligations of both the landlord and tenant under a standard residential lease agreement.
D. Based upon those rights and obligations, does Sam’s landlord have grounds to evict? Why or why not?
E. Further, what defenses might Sam raise to an eviction action? Support your response.
Case Study Three
Jeb and Josh are lifelong friends. Jeb is a wealthy wind-power tycoon, and Josh is an active outdoor enthusiast. They have decided to open a sporting goods store, Arcadia Sports, using Jeb’s considerable financial resources and Josh’s extensive knowledge of all things outdoors. In addition to selling sporting goods, the store will provide whitewater rafting, rock-climbing, and camping excursions. Jeb will not participate in the day-to-day operations of the store or in the excursions. Both Jeb and Josh have agreed to split the profits down the middle. On the first whitewater rafting excursion, a customer named Jane falls off the raft and suffers a severe concussion and permanent damage to her spine. Meanwhile, Jeb’s wind farms are shut down by government regulators, and he goes bankrupt, leaving extensive personal creditors looking to collect.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
A. Identify the main types of business entities and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.
B. Recommend a specific business entity for Arcadia Sports and include your reasoning.
C. Based on the characteristics of each type of business entity, determine the type under which Jeb and Josh would be personally liable to Jane for damages.
D. Based on each type of business entity, analyze the ability of Jeb’s personal creditors to seize the assets and/or profits of Arcadia Sports.
Guidelines for Submission: Each of the three reports should be three to six pages in length. The documents should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Citations must be given in APA format.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Business Law: Case Study Applications
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Date:
Business Law: Case Study Applications
Introduction
The legal application in business transactions undertaken in daily life necessitates the study of business law to help traverse the hurdles of the commercial world. The knowledge attained in the study of business law can be applied in assessing the suitability of contracts and practices enacted by individuals and/or corporations. The concept of business law encompasses ethicality &morality in transactions, employment and labor practices, manufacturing and the criminality realized as a result of business transactions and contractual engagements. The objective of business law is to evaluate the adherence to rules and regulations that govern the business world. This paper discusses the different legal applications involved in business applications and real estate scenarios using real-life examples of transactions and business relationships. The paper also evaluates the applicability of different types of contracts and settlement methods and the implications they have on the involved parties upon adoption. Each of the case studies tackled in the paper illustrates the legal applications in a particular business scenario which requires different approaches.
Case Study One: Donald Margolin versus Novelty Now Inc. and Funny Face
Donald Margolin and his company, Donald Margolin Inc., are suing Novelty Now Inc. and Funny Face for alleged negligence. Funny Face is an aftershave lotion that was manufactured as a result of a contract between three men (Chris, Matt, and Ian) and Novelty Now Inc. Donald filed the suit after using the Funny Face cream that turned his face to a permanent shade of blue and is seeking medical costs and compensation for the facial damages and business reputation.
Rules of jurisdiction
Several jurisdiction aspects are present in these scenarios due to the territoriality and state differences between the involved parties. Donald Margolin and his company filed the suit in New York while the agreement between Chris, Matt &Ian and Novelty Now required that all the conflicts concerning the product were to be brought to the state of Florida. Buxbaum (2009) talking about the aspect of jurisdiction asserted that jurisdiction is an essential part of any sovereign state and it applies within its borders, operating under territorial limitations, and whose assumptions would create conflicts with other states. Since state courts are not able to handle cases that involve different states, i.e. New York, California, and Florida in our case, Federal court will be the most likely choice for the case. The case has more than two defendants who have different roles in the case which might bring the aspect of several openings under the same case. This factor, aligned with the interstate situation involved in the case makes the adoption of concurrent jurisdiction the approach to handle the case in its entirety. Longarm principle would be applicable if the case was to be determined in New York. This would mean that a New York court would enact jurisdiction over both Funny Face and Novelty Now Inc. even if they are still in Florida.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Several conside...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!