State and National Context in Evaluating Cannabis Laws

State and National Contexts in Evaluating Cannabis Laws: A Case Study of Washington State.
Name
Institution
Course
Instructor
Date
State and National Contexts in Evaluating Cannabis Laws: A Case Study of Washington State.
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 7, 2023
To: The city manager of Excelsiorville
From:
Subject: State and National Context in Evaluating Cannabis Laws.
In 1998, Initiative (I) 692 legalized medical cannabis in Washington. The bill stated that people could keep up to 60 stock of cannabis and recognize a caregiver who could act on their behalf. Moreover, I-692 established an assenting legal defense for individuals with medical conditions like seizure disorders and written recommendations from doctors (Cambron et al., 2017). However, the policy did not provide a proper regulatory arrangement for growing, dispensing, purchasing, or distributing cannabis. As a result, most cannabis activities functioned in an indeterminate legitimate grey area. In 2007, Senate Bill 6032 was pursued to clarify the features of I-692 (Cambron et al., 2017). The policy commanded the Department of Health to define the 60-day supply of cannabis. The bill also substituted the word primary caregiver with a designated care provider. These providers could serve exclusively as a patient’s cannabis supplier. There was no endowment in I-692 and SB 6032 (Cambron et al., 2017). Nonetheless, venturesome providers gathered that if they served each patient by luck, they might work in a legitimate ill-defined situation as a pivoting assigned care supplier for every patient.
In 2010, Senate Bill (SB) 5798 expanded the grouping of clinical experts who could give pot suggestions. 2011 SB 5073 was a coordinated endeavor to control bootleg market marijuana supply with enlistment, authorizing, and guideline arrangements for shady dispensaries. The bill allowed Aggregate gardens; up to 10 patients and care suppliers could share assets to develop clinical pot for individual use. 2015 SB 5052 was passed, providing clear regulations for medical marijuana. The bill directed the Liquor Control Board to regulate and license cannabis shops. SB 5052 phased out all dispensaries, replacing them with I-502 shops. The policy also provided a way to track and identify medical marijuana patients (Cambron et al., 2017). The bill renamed collective gardens to cooperatives and required the institutions to register with the state and serve a maximum of...