Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Accounting, Finance, SPSS
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.04
Topic:

Principles of Financial Management. Reasons against Use of Company-Wide Cost of Capital

Case Study Instructions:

Mini-Case 9-2 (Chapter 9)
ExxonMobil ( XOM) is one of the half- dozen major oil companies in the world. The firm has four primary operating divisions ( upstream, downstream, chemical, and global services) as well as a number of operating companies that it has acquired over the years. A recent major acquisition was XTO Energy, which was acquired in 2009 for $ 41 billion. The XTO acquisition gave ExxonMobil a significant presence in the development of domestic unconventional natural gas resources, includ-ing the development of shale gas formations, which was booming at the time. Assume that you have just been hired to be an analyst working for ExxonMobil’s chief financial officer. Your first assignment was to look into the proper cost of capital for use in making corporate investments across the company’s many business units.
a. Would you recommend that ExxonMobil use a single company- wide cost of capital for analyzing capital expenditures in all its business units? Why or why not?
b. If you were to evaluate divisional costs of capital, how would you go about estimating these costs of capital for ExxonMobil? Discuss how you would approach the problem in terms of how you would evaluate the weights to use for various sources of capital as well as how you would estimate the costs of individual sources of capital for each division.
Instructions: In 600-750 words in length (not including title page and reference page), respond to the case below. Your paper must include at least two scholarly journal references (in addition to your book: Keown, A. J., Martin, J. D., & Petty, J. W. (2014). Foundations of finance: The logic and practice of financial management, (9th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson). Refer to the Writing Assignment Grading Criteria below for requirements in content, organization, writing style, grammar and APA 6.0 format
Your assignment will be graded according to the following Writing Assignment Grading Rubric:

Guidelines
Writing Assignment Requirements

Content (60%)
Response demonstrate a clear understanding of the key elements of assignment questions.
Responses thoroughly cover the elements in a substantive manner.
Response demonstrates critical thinking and analysis.
Content is complete and accurate.
Introduction and conclusion provides adequate information on the given topic.

Organization (20%)
Paper structure is clear and easy to follow.
Ideas flow in a logical sequence.
Introduction provides a sound introduction to the topic and previews major points.
Paragraph transitions are logical and support the flow of thought throughout the paper.
The conclusion thoroughly reviews the major points.

Writing Style,
Grammar, APA Format (20%)
Sentences are well constructed, complete, clear, and concise.
Words used are specific and unambiguous.
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment.
Grammar, spelling and punctuation are correct.
APA guidelines (6th edition) are followed, such as title page, headers, citations, references, etc.
Effective use of aids, such as sections, summaries, table of contents, indices, and appendices (if appropriate)

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Reasons against Use of Company-Wide Cost of Capital
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
Reasons against Use of Company-Wide Cost of Capital
As the newly appointed chief financial officer, I would not advise ExxonMobil to use a single company-wide cost of capital when analyzing the capital expenditure in all of its business units. This is because the company has a different business unit and each business unit varies in their cost structures (Smith & Zhao, 2016). The business units also possess different risk levels. Single company-wide cost is not applicable in a company that has different business units as ExxonMobil. Hence it would be risky using this model to analyze the capital expenditure in all the business units. To make more accurate business decisions, the company's wide cost has to be adjusted for each business unit. If the company uses single company-wide cost to analyze the capital expenditure, the company will either drop some of it accepted projects, or it can run projects that are not potentially viable for the company.
In any company, the significant function of the capital project is the value added which is seen when the price of the company's stock change within a certain period. In this case, huge investment and commitment are needed in capital projects to avoid making of incorrect decisions which may lead to the company incurring long-term financial losses which may lead to the company's failure leading to its non-existence. It is an important aspect to use the best cost of capital in which different companies use different methods. Through analysis of each department risk level, the most effective method of analyzing capital expenditure is determined.
Since the company has different business units which differ in the level of risk, each business unit must use an interest rate to analyze the impacts of the expected flow of cash in the different periods. The interest rate is also known as the cutoff rate. It is the accepted minimum rate of return for each project in the various business units. It is important for the company to estimate the various business unit cut off rates that will show the risk of each business unit. Depending on the use of financial capital which includes equity and debt, wide cost...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!