Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Level:
Turabian
Topic:
Social Sciences
Type:
Book Review
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 24.3
Topic:

The President's Czars: Undermining Congress and the Constitution (Book Review Sample)

Instructions:

Book Review 01 Instructions and grading rubric

 

*** Read all instructions and grading rubric carefully before writing your research paper. You are responsible for having read and understood these documents.

You will write a book review on The President’s Czars: Undermining Congress and the Constitution by Sollenberger & Rozell. Be sure to review the “Book Review Grading Rubric” (below) before starting this assignment.

The “Book Review” should be 5–full pages in length, not including the title and bibliography page. Format your review in 5 main sections: Introduction, Summary, Critique, Personal Response, and Conclusion. Do not summarize or critique the chapters chronologically. Consider the book as a whole. Avoid excessive quotations. State the authors’ view points in your own words and give specific page references when paraphrasing.

  • Introduction

Give a brief introduction of the book you are reviewing. Be sure to include a thesis statement of the major points, etc. (Brief introduction MUST be at least 6-8 sentences long)

  • Summary

Summarize the main theme of the book. What is the overall perspective, purpose, or argument of the book? If the author wanted you to get one idea from the book, what would it be?

  • Critique

This section needs to balance the book's strengths and weaknesses in order to unify your evaluation. You must include a biblical or philosophical standard of constitutional government in your analysis. What strikes you as noteworthy? What has the book accomplished? In what ways was the book effective or persuasive? Challenge assumptions, approaches, or arguments made by the author. Does the argument make sense? You can offer agreement or disagreement and identify where you find the work exemplary or deficient in its knowledge, judgments, or organization. Provide concrete evidence for your assertions. Support judgements with references from the textbook reading in this course. Be sure that your evaluation is balanced, respectful, and fair. Control the tone of your critique.

  • Personal Response


This section should demonstrate how the book has enhanced your understanding of the issues in the book, etc. You must also introduce new ideas that go beyond the book if they compliment ideas you have gleaned from reading in the book. Rmemeber, go beyond “just” your personal response to the book – Think outside the box.

 

  • Conclusion

 

Give a brief conclusion (Brief conclusion MUST be at least 8-10 sentences long).

 

***Further Instructions on Assignment:

Please follow instructions above and grading rubric very thoroughly and carefully. Make sure this assignment has an Introduction, Summary, Critique, Personal Response, and Conclusion.  Must be formatted in current Turabian style and include a title and a bibliography page. Make sure to include (correct) page numbers for citations. NO PLAGIARISM as I will check if it is OR not. DO NOT STRAY FROM WHAT THIS ASSIGNMENT IS ASKING; MAKE SURE TO COVER ALL AREAS BEING ASKED (ABOVE UNDER “PROMPT”). Remember, this is a graduate (Master’s) level assignment, so make sure that it is – Graduate level academic writing on this assignment is very important.

 

ONLY use the sources I’ve asked (below).

 

It is important to write persuasively and think critically as well as think outside the box.

 

***Further Instructions on Sources: I will upload the full book; it is split up into 8 parts. Read the whole book, then write the book review.

 

  1. 12 references/citations from the book itself, The President’s Czars: Undermining Congress and the Constitution by Sollenberger & Rozell. (Be sure to cite properly as well as include the correct page number for each citation – Paraphrase and write in your own words as well).

 

  1. 3 biblical principles/scriptures MUST be used and incorporated – Do not randomly pick a biblical verse. Only choose biblical verses that makes sense and has connections with what is being written.

 

  1. PDF “Critical Book Review Guide” will help explain what to do for each sections and use as a guide to writing an appropriate book review.

 

  1. PDF “Thesis Statement for Book Review” will help and guide you on how to write one properly for a book review.

 

It is CRUCIAL to write persuasively, and think critically and analytically. It is also CRUCIAL to think outside the box.

 

“BOOK REVIEW GRADING RUBRIC” is below – Follow it!

 

 

 

 

 

source..
Content:

Book review: The President's Czars: Undermining Congress and the Constitution
Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:
Introduction
Sollenberger and Rozell bring to the attention of the readers the aspects of the presidential powers in light of the constitution. They challenge some of the major decisions that have been made by past presidents to appoint officers in their executive offices who have subtle powers on matters related to certain policy areas. These appointees work independently, even though they are not confirmed by the Senate or their work overseen by Congress. The presidential Czars, is the name that is used to refer to these appointees. In most of the documented cases in the book, there are signs that most of the presidents turn to the czars for advice on the various issues that would otherwise have to go through Congress (pg. 49). As such, the presidential powers are seen to have very few limitations to what they can do and what they can authorize without having to answer to the channels set out in the constitution of the nation. The czars appointment not only violate the Appointment Clause, but it also undermines the constitutional provision that states that, the presidents do not have the power to unilaterally establish offices and appoint offices without the legislative mechanisms in place (pg. 158).
Thesis statement: The following is a review Sollenberger and Rozell’s work The President's Czars: Undermining Congress and the Constitution, on how Czars appointments are a violation of the constitution.
Summary
Sollenberger and Rozell bring out some of the most insightful ideas in the book with reference to government and public policies. In their book they deliberate on the so called czars, who are officers appointed by the president and offered unparalleled power to make judgment on policies especially in the times of emergencies. The theme in the book is thus focused on the fact that there are some irregularities in the way that the czars are appointed relative to the provisions in the constitution. These are persons that tend to override the elected and appointed state officials in their mandate and they are not scrutinized for their actions and decisions.
The main purpose of the book is largely to paint the picture of the violations that appointing czars brings to the executive with close reference to the constitutions. The authors enlighten the readers on the basic workings of the czar and how they undermine the other public offices, let alone their appointments in the first place. Czars have been around for quite some time and presidents use them in an effort to shield themselves from the scrutiny of the Congress. In most cases they are not confirmed by the Senate or Congress but their override the powers and the procedures laid out for the two houses. In the current government, there is an office that is run by Fienberg and has power to implement presidential orders such as the one that was given during the BP oil disaster. On the same matter, Feinberg was instructed by the president to oversee the process of compensating the victims of the oil spill worth billion dollars.
Ironically, the office is not regulated by Congress and so the order to do as the presidents wants is left in a state where accountability is close to impossible. In more than a few cases, there have been individuals who have been given broad roles such as those to be carried out by already existing officers who in this case are confirmed by Congress. The main idea of the authors is to bring out, the element of creating officers through the executive orders, in which case these officers are not answerable to Congress is unconstitutional and therefore violation as well as abuse of power, by circumventing the policy process.
Critique
One of the most noteworthy theme in the book is the fact, ...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • The President's Czars: Undermining Congress and the Constitution
    Description: Sollenberger and Rozell bring to the attention of the readers the aspects of the presidential powers in light of the constitution...
    5 pages/≈1375 words| 2 Sources | Turabian | Social Sciences | Book Review |
  • Our Global Neighborhood
    Description: The Commission on Global Governance recognized the need to have a definite civic ethic based on share values in a global neighborhood....
    5 pages/≈1375 words| 2 Sources | Turabian | Social Sciences | Book Review |
  • 506: Clash of Civilizations Book Review
    Description: Samuel Huntington in the Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order argues that civilization has become one of the most important aspects of geopolitics...
    5 pages/≈1375 words| 2 Sources | Turabian | Social Sciences | Book Review |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!