Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
6 pages/β‰ˆ1650 words
Sources:
No Sources
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Book Report
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.92
Topic:

HSD-3044-R: A History Of The Human Body Fall 2017

Book Report Instructions:

HSD-3044-R: A HISTORY OF THE HUMAN BODY Fall 2017 Project This project involves reading the following materials, writing a detailed summary which addresses the associated questions. The readings are available in the Google Drive folder. If you have a particular source or topic you wish to pursue, please talk to me about it after class one day. First Reading: From Laura J. Snyder, The Eye of the Beholder: Johannes Vermeer, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, and the Reinvention of Seeing (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2015). This reading discusses one of the greatest empirical minds of the Scientific Revolution, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek. Van Leeuwenhoek became famous for his investigations involving very powerful microscopes. Write a fairly detailed summary of the material and address the following questions. 1. What can you learn about Van Leeuwenhoek's microscopes and methods of observing? 2. What difficulties did he face in getting others to accept his findings? 3. What do his experiences suggest about the nature of scientific interaction and communication in the Seventeenth Century? 4. What particular things did Van Leeuwenhoek observe and what particular discoveries did he make? Second Reading: From Paul R. Josephson, Totalitarian Science and Technology, 2nd Edition (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2005). One aspect of modern science is that it is often used for ideological purposes. This reading illustrates how ideology sometimes takes over something that is otherwise practical and empirical. Write a fairly detailed summary of the material and, within it, address the following questions. 1. What examples of the totalitarian control of science does the author describe? 2. How does the particular ideology shape the understanding of scientific claims? 3. What effects does ideological control have on scientists themselves? 4. Does ideological control of science tend to strengthen or weaken regimes? There is no particular length requirement, but to do a rigorous job I would say that the minimum would be at least between six to eight pages, if they are typed and double-spaced. The due date is listed on the Syllabus.

Book Report Sample Content Preview:

Reading Summary: History of the Human Body
Name
Institution Affiliation
Reading Summary: History of the Human Body
Snyder Laura. Eye of the Beholder: Johannes Vermeer, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, and the Reinvention of Seeing. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2015.
1 What can you learn about Van Leeuwenhoek's microscopes and methods of observing?
Leeuwenhoek had devised microscopes that no one had ever seen at that time. He had been making them for so long, but finally, De Graaf encouraged him to write to the Royal Society about his microscopes and he recorded most of his discoveries in letters as compared to books as they appeared to use up the time he would have used to make observations. From the kind of writing exhibited, he appeared to rush through the writing so as to get time to invent and discover more things. He started off by discovering tiny cheese mites and grains of chalk. He was encouraged by the Royal Society secretary to research more on blood and body fluids. Leeuwenhoek’s methods of observation were gruesome, for instance, when he left lice on his calf for days in order to determine the reproductive rate of lice and draw his conclusions. Additionally, he was quite reluctant to share most of his methods he used to conclude the various discoveries he made over the course of his time. Therefore, the Royal society detected some form of ingenuity in his discoveries.
The scientist examined everything, even things one cannot imagine and he endured all the bad things that came with his observation; the smells and unclean sights and he ensured that he explored each one of them clearly stating that no scientific observation was in vain. Most of his discoveries were gross to imagine and the lengths he went to for science are unfathomable. One particular incident is when he discovered the animalcules living in human teeth and he had to test the spittle of his wife and daughter in his discovery process. He finally concluded that these organisms were largely responsible for bad breaths and the only way to deal with them as if the personal drank hot liquids and cleaned regularly with both salt and vinegar. His discoveries created much fame for him and at some point, people had to make appointments in order to visit him. He presented most of his discoveries to royal families and his discoveries created awe in the world. He was respected, despite having gruesome discoveries and his scientific observations grew every year. He got to a point where he would place the specimens on a microscope ready for viewing by the people who had come to visit him. He never cared what people thought of his discoveries and at some point, he openly showed the Duke the semen of a dog and went further to insist on the presence of a tail.
2 What difficulties did he face in getting others to accept his findings?
Most of his discoveries appeared exaggerated and people could not figure out how he was able to identify the tiny organisms he mentioned in his observations. This created some sort of doubt especially among the royal society who had a difficulty in understanding how he would make such tiny discoveries. The only way the truth about his discoveries would be identified is if other scientists were allowed to analyze his ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Book Report Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!