Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Article Critique
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Should FEMA remain under Department of Homeland Security

Article Critique Instructions:

For this assignment, you will choose a scholarly article pertinent to your research topic and write a review of it. You will "de-construct" the article for the reader, analyzing the claims that the author is making and how well he/she supports those claims. You will also explain how this article fits into your research strategy to answer your research question. Does it provide some insights but still leave you wondering?
I have attached the scholarly article that I would like a review of
Answers should be at a minimum of 2-3 pages (the Title Page and Reference page will be additional pages).
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space.
APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
Use a scholarly source.
Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize: books, peer reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
Your responses are to be in your own words with minimal quotes.

Article Critique Sample Content Preview:

Article Critique: Should FEMA Remain Under DHS
Name
Institution
Date
Article Critique: Should FEMA Remain Under DHS
In most cases, disasters are inevitable and the only viable option is for people to prepare on how to handle them properly when they happen. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) plays a critical role in the preparation and management of emergencies both man-made and natural ones. However, the reorganization of this agency to fall under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been a controversial issue with some individuals supporting the change while other oppose. In the article “Fire service leaders urge that FEMA remain in DHS; IAEM-USA says no,” the author examines and discusses the arguments presented by proponents and opponent of removing FEMA from DHS (Fire Engineering, 2009). While the article is informative in regards to the position of various organizations regarding the issue of FEMA being under DHS, it fails to provide evidence or even simple examples that can illustrates the views of each side.
In this article, the author used the views and opinions of leaders of various organizations that are involved in emergency management in the country. Notably, most of the views of proponents of having FEMA remain under DHS were fire service leaders from IAFC, IAFF, and CFSI. These individuals requested that the President-elect at that time, Barack Obama, to maintain FEMA under DHS because separating it would be endangering America’s emergency response capabilities. These views were also supported by DHS secretary who noted that separating the two agencies will lead to increase in bureaucracy and would denied FEMA access to many resources offered by DHS. On the other hand, the opponents of having FEMA remain under DHS were members of the U.S. Council of the International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM-USA). The opponents pointed to the differing mission of the DHS and FEMA as one of the reasons why the two organizations should be independent (Fire E...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Article Critique Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now