Language Development Articles Critique Assignment Paper (Article Critique Sample)
I need meticulous criticism for about 30 articles but their pages vary from 6 pages to about 25 pages
the deadline is three days
Please start forwardly without any introduction because I will write it.
I would like you to analyse and criticize each article individually in a table-like to compare them, showing the following:
-a brief explanation of the theory (if there is any based on the article)
-explain briefly the claim
-indicate the research question(s) or hypotheses
-explain any strengths or weaknesses in the methodology (including the participants, the test e.g. non-sense words, if you think that these words are not natural for native speakers and why, any weaknesses in the discussion or the statistics) ..etc.
-indicate the findings and how they support the claim or the hypothesis
-find the gap (if there is any for further research)
- show what is the evidence to support the hypothesis. In other words, does the given experiment provide evidence for the cause of the deficit. It is assumed that there are several causes for the deficit of SLI children, but I want you to focus on three of them: grammar-based, phonology-based or working-memory based.
I will send you the articles and expect you to send them back to me by highlighting any sentences you take your information form in the articles, so that I can recognize it easily.
When you paraphrase or summarize, don't use the same structure or words of the original article, please. Cite any paraphrase or summary by providing a page number, please. Use APA style.
In your writing, use simple English style and words, please. This is for non-native speakers. Thank you.
Please focus on these articles by reading them carefully and analyzing them in detail more than other articles.
Here are the names of the files:
Working Memory and Specific Language
Marshall - Ebbels - Harris - van der Lely 2002
Joanisse - Seidenberg 2004
Van der Lely - Rosen - McClelland 1998
Kindly find the attached files here.
For the sake of clarity, I will send the instructions again. This is a suggested table but you can extend it. I think this way is helpful for me later when I make a comparison among the articles.
I will enclose the chart in the chat box.
I would like you to analyse and criticize each article individually in a table-like to compare them by showing the following:
-a brief explanation of the theory ( if there is any based on the article)
- identify the claim
- specify the research question(s) or hypotheses
-describe the strengths or weaknesses in the methodology (including the participants, the test e.g. non-sense words, if you think that these words are not natural for native speakers and why, any weaknesses in the discussion or the statistics) ..etc.
-indicate the findings and how they support the claim or the hypothesis. what is the evidence to support the hypothesis. In other words, does the given experiment provide evidence for the cause of the deficit. It is assumed that there are several causes for the deficit of SLI children, but I want you to focus on three of them: grammar, phonology or working memory.
Then, based on the article, summarize the main characteristics of each proposition: grammar, phonology and working-memory
-the gap (if there is any for further research)
I will send you the articles and expect you to send them back to me by highlighting any sentences you take your information form in the articles to support or paraphrase, so that I can recognize the information very fast.
Cite any paraphrase or summary by always providing a page number, please. Use APA style
Evidence for the claim
Limitations of study
Characteristics of SLI relevant to phonological-based
Characteristics of SLI relevant to grammar-based
Characteristics of SLI relevant to working-memory
SLI Phonology 1
Phonological processing in subjects with specific Language Impairment
SLI has an effect on the hearing perception alterations, memory deficit and limits the processing ability of the brain.
Majority of the SLI children who were used in the two studies that were carried showed alterations in PP skills. Children with limited phonologic ability were also observed to have developed other difficulties that are associated with SLI Languages.
The investigation that was used in the study is non- procedural as such and therefore the results that will obtained will be having various deficits. Exclusion of the children who had shown a history language communication problems would affect the outcome of the study. They should have been included in the study since they were included in the previous study of phonologic language communication difficulties.
SLI Children were observed to be having phonologic deficit as compared to the other children with TLD. It is due to the difference in creation and retention of representations in working memory CITATION Ana14 \l 1033 (Ana & Simone, 2014).(p 5)
SLI showed slow learning skills in the study. The slow speed was associated with the alterations in phonological presentations. The SLI showed a slow ability of memorising vocabulary and reading comprehension sentences p. 5.
Children with SLI show limited storage working and storage memory which is the cause of the LSI difficulties that are experienced by the children.
SLI Phonology 4
Past-Tense Morphology and Phonological Deficits in Children With Dyslexia and Children With Language Impairment.
Past tense morphology problem is associated with children with dyslexia as compared to the ones who have oral language impairment.
Studies carried out revealed that the children with dyslexia and LI have similar problems phonological awareness and also they faced difficulties in realising the past tense of the various words that were used in the study.
Unlike the other studies carried out, this study focused on the use of other features such as paste tense. However, morphologies such as past tense are likely to affect the results of the study since its more of IQ and the other students who were used in the study might not be native English speakers. The age of the children will also be a bias of the results that will be obtained. Children as low as 6 months were used in the study.
Aspects of morphological processing are observed to be the cause of poor phonological awareness among the children. It was also observed that phonological was very essential for the children to determine the present and the past tense of a given verb.
Children with reading impairments had problem with inflectional morphology. The inflectional morphology involved difficulties with the plurals and the past tense verbs CITATION Eri12 \l 1033 (Erin K, Marc F, Amy S., & Alexandra, 2012).
The children were observed to produce and make the same errors in their pronunciation. For instance due to the influence of overregulation, they would say sleep-sleeped. Such difficulties affected the communication skills of the children in various environments.
SLI Phonology 3
Phonological Representation in Children with SLI
The hypothesis for the study is that the children with SLI have difficulties in processing information that is based on sounds which also includes the wa...
- Reflections On Reasons For Judgment In Delgamuukw Vs. B.CDescription: In the article, Fisher addresses the reasons why the judgment of Chief Justice Allan McEachern in Delgamuukw v. B.C has been opposed by anthropologists and the natives....5 pages/≈1375 words | 2 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Article Critique |
- Article Critique AssignmentDescription: Undergraduate writing level 4 pages Literature and Language Format Style English (U.S.) Article Critique. Article Critique Assignment...4 pages/≈1100 words | 1 Source | APA | Literature & Language | Article Critique |
- The black pearl article Description: Undergraduate Article Critique: The black pearl article ...3 pages/≈825 words | 2 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Article Critique |