1 page/≈275 words
The Farming Household As A Fundamental Unit Of Analysis (Article Critique Sample)
Dear Writer, The following points must be included in the critique summary: 1. Why was the study conducted, or why was the paper written? What gaps in knowledge or understanding was it intended to fill? 2. What hypotheses were tasted or what research was reviewed? 3. What are the results or conclusions? 4. Who do the results or conclusions shed light on broader issues? 5. What questions did the paper raised for you? 6. What potential methodological problems or flaws in reasoning did you notice? 7. What are some alternative interpretations of the results? 8. Other comets. Please make sure that the sentences are short, simple and direct. Thanks. source..
THE FARMING HOUSEHOLD AS A FUNDAMENTAL UNIT OF ANALYSIS
(15 November, 2010)
The Farming Household as a Fundamental Unit of Analysis
This paper is a critique summary of the article “Chapter 7: The Farming Household As A Fundamental Unit Of Analysis.” The paper attempts to exemplify the facts which surround farming household as a fundamental unit of analysis. Household in this analysis has been considered to be a resemblance of art, therefore there is not paramount definition, and this is because household is only distinguished when visible. The main emphasis for the study was generally connected to household angle, and this analysis defined household as the daily co-residence, physical estate control such as livestock, arable land and farm tools, familial relationship and family members duties.
The gaps of knowledge which the analysis deemed to fill were urged through the chapters. This discussed on how the population/agriculture debate requires disaggregation in diverse lower spatial scale compared to the total population. Further more the literary analysis also exemplified on how the household in the population is the most conspicuous functional group on daily basis of our working live in mostly the preindustrial farming communities, and also offers the best positioning for commencing disaggregation. However, the analysis articulates that this also may be a smaller avenue to for the general rule to capture in the whole process of attaching traditional framing and demography.
The hypotheses tested through the research evaluated the types of household extension and their operational daily function. This further exemplified on the household scientific disciplines focused on the paramount characteristics and processes that govern this unit. This test analyzed household on the ground of as a unit in the angle of demographic, economic, social, cultural and nutritional analysis.
The conclusion centralized on this analysis of household as a unit, noted that the household mostly depends upon some common aspects such as house, farmstead and farm possession. This documented in detail the house itself as a unit, the farmstead and the social environment as the spatial organization. The flaws in the research are that it centralized on mostly the social environmen...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
- Thinking about Population and Traditional Farmers Description: Undergraduate level Article Critique: Thinking about Population and Traditional Farmers ...1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Life Sciences | Article Critique |
- Unit ReviewDescription: Undergraduate level Article Critique: Unit Review...2 pages/≈550 words | 1 Source | APA | Life Sciences | Article Critique |
- Genetic Evidence for the Convergent Evolution of Light SkinDescription: Undergraduate writing level 1 page Life Sciences Format Style English (U.S.) Article Critique. Genetic Evidence for the Convergent Evolution of Light Skin...1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Life Sciences | Article Critique |