Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections Research (Article Critique Sample)
Writiquing the validity and robustness of research featured in journal articles provides a critical foundation for engaging in evidence-based practice. In Weeks 5 and 6, you explored quantitative research designs. In Week 7, you will examine qualitative and mixed methods research designs. For this Assignment, which is due by Day 7 of Week 7, you critique a quantitative and either a qualitative or a mixed methods research study and compare the types of information obtained in each.
Select a health topic of interest to you that is relevant to your current area of practice. The topic may be your Course Portfolio Project or a different topic of your choice., locate two articles in scholarly journals that deal with your portfolio topic: 1) Select one article that utilizes a quantitative research design and 2) select a second article that utilizes either a qualitative OR a mixed methods design. These need to be single studies not systematic or integrative reviews (including meta-analysis and metasynthesis). You may use research articles from your reference list. If you cannot find these two types of research on your portfolio topic, you may choose another topic.
Locate the following documents in this week’s Learning Resources to access the appropriate templates, which will guide your critique of each article:
Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
Critique Template for a Quantitative Study
Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study
Consider the fields in the templates as you review the information in each article. Begin to draft a paper in which you analyze the two research approaches as indicated below. Reflect on the overall value of both quantitative and qualitative research. If someone were to say to you, “Qualitative research is not real science,” how would you respond?
To complete this Assignment:
Complete the two critiques using the appropriate templates.
Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Contrast the types of information that you gained from examining the two different research approaches in the articles that you selected.
Describe the general advantages and disadvantages of the two research approaches featured in the articles. Use examples from the articles for support.
Formulate a response to the claim that qualitative research is not real science. Highlight the general insights that both quantitative and qualitative studies can provide to researchers. Support your response with references to the Learning Resources and other credible sources.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative study of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections
October 16, 2016
Your Institution of Affiliation
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research Designs
In any field of knowledge, the debate between the use of either quantitative or qualitative research design has been an age-old issue. On one hand, the debate argues that in doing research, a more objective, deductive, and concise way of analysis should be employed (Ebling Library, 2016). More specifically, this side argues that this objectivity can only be reached through the use of â€˜numerical' data in doing research. On the other hand, the focus is given to the more subjective, inductive, and broad means of data analysis (Ebling Library, 2016). Preference between these two can differ based on the field of knowledge. For the Social Sciences, Liberal Arts, and the Humanities, the qualitative approach is almost always used (except for Economics), while the latter one is usually chosen for the Hard Sciences. Following from this, as a subfield of the hard sciences (medical sciences), Nursing â€œshouldâ€ employ more quantitative study as its main unit of analysis. However, as the author of this paper argues, among the hard sciences, this field should be the one which strikes a balance between the qualitative and the quantitative since it deals directly with â€œpeopleâ€ with an emphasis on an evidenced-based practice (Russell & Gregory, 2003). To support this thesis, this article provides a comparative analysis of two research â€“ one quantitative and one qualitative â€“ that discuss Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections or CLABSI.
In a study by Garman et al (2015) on the relationship between the â€œhospital's levelâ€ and the outcomes of a program that they have to â€œprevent central line-associated bloodstream infectionsâ€ a qualitative approach is mainly employed through the use of in-depth interviews. During the research, one hundred ninety-four (194) interviewees from eight (8) US hospitals were included. The authors preferred the use of an in-depth interview rather than the use of a survey since the main aim of the study is not only to correlate the two (2) variables â€“ hospital level and success in preventing CLABSI â€“ but also to find the â€˜points/practices' that results to this disparity. In the results of the study, it was reported that every ...
- Sampling CritiqueDescription: Health and Medicine Article Critique: Sampling Critique...2 pages/≈550 words | 1 Source | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Critical Appraisal: Effectiveness of Rapid Response SystemDescription: In this paper, two articles have been considered for critical appraisal. The first article is about the effectiveness of rapid response system. ...9 pages/≈2475 words | 10 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections ResearchDescription: Describe the general advantages and disadvantages of the two research approaches featured in the articles. Use examples from the articles for support....3 pages/≈825 words | 5 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |