Questions about Ethics on Drug Testing Work Place (Article Critique Sample)
Cranford, M. (1998). Drug testing and right to privacy: Arguing the ethics of workplace drug testing. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), 1805-1815.
After reading the article, write a 500-word paper by addressing each of the following:
- Briefly introduce and summarize the article.
- Do the author’s arguments support his or her main point?
- What evidence supports the main point?
- What were the roles involved in the article?
- How could the topic of this article apply to your personal or professional life?
- How could the topic apply to an organization you have observed?
- What conclusions can you draw about the ethical issues facing business leaders?
- How would you explain the role of leadership in corporate culture, leadership styles, and how they affect ethical decision making?
- What is your opinion of the article?
- Are there any inherent unethical practices with drug testing, though it is technically legal?
The Unit II Article Critique should be at least 500 words in length, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font
Ethics on Drug Testing
Michael Cranford in the article Drug Testing and the Right to Privacy: Arguing the Ethics of Workplace Drug Testing; discusses some of the most volatile opinions that encircle the issue of employers testing their employees for drug abuse (Cranford, n.d.). As mentioned in the article, drug testing is an element that is used by employers to try and increase the amount of profits that they can get from the human resources that they have. This is done by minimizing the economic impacts that employees have on the business processes when they are considered to be having drug abuse complications. The article brings to light some two main arguments that have been brought in light of the topic on drug testing at the work place. One of the argument that is brought in light of drug testing at the work place related to the idea that; drug testing at the work place is a violation of the employee privacy (Cranford, n.d.). The other argument relates to the idea that, employers are entitled to the access of such information as the drug use complications among their employees (Hanly, 2016). This largely relates to the economic costs associated with employees abusing drugs and reducing their level of productivity that then affects the company output in the long run. However Cranford then explains why drug testing does not amount to privacy violation as indicated in the counter arguments.
The author develops the argument in a very skillful manner, by first bringing out the counter argument that states that, drug tests tend to invade the privacy of the employees (Cranford, n.d.). The author then brings in the main argument in support of the drug tests at the ...
- Regulation and the InternetDescription: Business and Marketing Article Critique: Regulation and the Internet...2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Business & Marketing | Article Critique |
- Find on Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Journal About Sport MarketingDescription: Very specific to the contents of the report and is of the correct format where the author begins with the background and ends with the findings of the report....1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Business & Marketing | Article Critique |
- Discussion Paper 7-1: The WorldCom - What Happened?Description: Identify which two barriers to effective communication were most prominent within WorldCom and explain how these barriers led to the downfall of the company....1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | APA | Business & Marketing | Article Critique |