Annotated Bibliography: Journal of Intercultural Relations (Annotated Bibliography Sample)
dear support, i choose the literature and language for Subject area coz my major is linguistics.
dear writer, i will upload tow articles about apologies
and the instructor .please avoid plagiarism.
The assignment should be written in two parts. The first is an annotated bibliography, in which you should summarise the main objectives, concepts, goals, methods and conclusions/findings of the paper. This section need not be a critical evaluation. The two annotated bibliographies should be about 300 words each.
The second part is a critical review of the two papers written as a short essay. The essay should be about 900 words.
In this essay you should compare the objectives, rationale and research questions of the two papers; then compare the research methodologies, including an evaluation of the appropriateness of the methodologies; you should compare and evaluate the findings of the two papers; and finally you should write a summary evaluation and comparison of the two papers, including its relevance to teaching ICC in an applied linguistics, language teaching or translation and interpreting context.
BarnLund, D. C. & Yoshioka, M. (1990). Apologies: Japanese and American Styles; International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 193-206.
This journal seeks to investigate the styles of interactions from Americans and Japanese. Barnlund and Yoshioka used a number of ways to achieve their goal of learning the interaction styles especially apologies of this two countries. According to the two authors, human behavior is governed by meaning assigned to an event rather than by objective of the event. The article begins with two aircraft crash scenarios which leads to 77 people (US crash) and 24 people (Tokyo Bay crash) killed. Despite the misfortune, no apology is given by the crew, airline officials or even government from America. The Tokyo Bay airline president on the other hand, together with his crew apologized to the families affected by the Tokyo Bay Crush and even resigned their jobs.
According to this Journal, apologies constitute a wide behavior spectrum that is essential in satisfying varying communicative purposes. Barnuld and Yoshioka describe an apology to be a simple conversation, an awareness term, an empathy/ sympathy message, or a means to making a transition. The two further conducted semi- structured interviews on Japanese and American students. The interviews were to help them understand the major cultural variables that affect types of apologies in American and Japan. Through apology questionnaires, the authors were able to clearly examine behaviors in the two countries when it comes to dealing with social problems and situations that require an apology. According to this journal, Japanese have no problem of directly apologizing without trying to justify their actions. The Americans also have no problem in giving a direct apology; however, they try to explain reason behind their action as a way of justifying themselves. Results from this journal’s research also show that Japanese have wider range of apologies compared to Americans.
Naomi, S. (1997). A Japan – U.S. Comparison of Apology Styles; SAGE social science collections
In this article, Naomi compares apology styles of Americans and Japanese people. According to the article, Apology is a topic that is often overlooked and it is less applied in the US compared to other cultures. Naomi argues that when an apology is well given, the offended person changes the negative appraisal on the offender. The author further indicates that apology is more popular in Japan compared to the United States. A study is conducted on this journal to examine the Japanese and American’s behavior; find out if the offender will be willing to respond through apology to situations that deserve an apology. In the research two hundred students from the US and 181 others from Japanese are requested to create messages that would show what an offender would say as a response to situations that are potentially offending. The questionnaires involved real life interpersonal situation.
After the study was completed, Naomi reports that both Americans and Japanese responded to the situations through the strategy of “stating the damage”. Nevertheless, there were differences on how Americans and Japanese responded to different scenarios that required apologies. Both groups applied different strategies of apologies. Majority of the United States participants included accounts in their apologies while the Japanese added statements of remorse to their apologies. The journal further states that the Japanese showed intention to compensate for their mistakes gave promises of not repeating the same mistake and even begged for forgiveness. Naomi states that Japanese are more willing to repair and give compensation for damage that...
- Working with groupsDescription: Literature and Language Essay: Working with groups...3 pages/≈825 words | 5 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Annotated Bibliography |
- Reflective Annotated Bibliography::The Four SectionsDescription: The paper contains information on creation of an electronic e-commerce systems such that a client can order a product and pay it online using a credit card ...2 pages/≈550 words | 6 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Annotated Bibliography |
- Doing business in ChinaDescription: Doing business in China Literature and Language Annotated Bibliography...1 page/≈275 words | 12 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Annotated Bibliography |