Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Term Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Peter Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia

Term Paper Instructions:

You are to research a Landmark Court Special Education Case that has changed the course of history for special education. This is to be a short synopsis (overview) of the case in your own words. Write a 1 ½ - 2-page double spaced paper that includes the following information.
1. Summary - Background history of the case (explanation of what the case is about)
2. Why was this a landmark case
3. How and why the case got to the Supreme Court
4. Outcome – Which side won and why?
You may want to check out www(dot)wrightslaw(dot)com, www(dot)findlaw(dot)com, and landmark court cases in special education. Don’t forget the cover page!
5.Last page-is a reference page of the Landmark court case and findings- in MLA style.
1. Armstrong vs. Kline

2. Brown vs. Board of Education

3. Diana vs. State Board of Education

4. Larry P. vs. Riles

5. Tatro vs. State of Texas

6. Board of Ed. Hudson vs. School District vs. Rowley

7. Cedar Rapids vs. Garret

8. Forest Grove vs. T.A.

9. Mills vs. Board of Education

10. Arlington vs. Murphy

Term Paper Sample Content Preview:

University of Affiliation
Peter Mills et al. v. Board of Education of District of Columbia et al.
Rights of Children with Disabilities
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor's Name
Date
Summary
The case of Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia is a landmark case for it established the right of children to special education. The class-action suit started from the desire of seven "exceptional" children to obtain private education and instruction due to their special needs back in 1971. This includes not only instructions and lectures but also appropriate facilities and learning resources for their needs. Accordingly, although their relief was initially heeded by the Board of education, they were still excluded from public institutions through an assurance of special tuition grants. Upon filing the class-action suit, the Board raised the defense that their duty is to provide free education and not specialized training and education. In the end, the Supreme Court ruled that contrary to their claims, the Board also has the duty to provide "publicly supported education suited to each child's needs," including those who have learning and other difficulties.
Landmark Decision
This case is a landmark decision for it changed the way how public education is required to cater to the needs of special children. Before this, it is sufficient that (1) public education can provide for the general needs of children and (2) there is a valid defense of "lack of funding" to cater for the additional needs of exceptional children. However, because of this case, it was mandated that public institutions (particularly educational institutions) should also cater to special children's needs with the appropriate and tailor-fitted curriculum, resources, and facilities. Additionally, the defense of 'lack of fundin...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Term Paper Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!