Arnold and Bowie’s “Sweatshops and Respect For Persons”. Term Paper
(1) Write a short term paper on Arnold and Bowie’s “Sweatshops and Respect For Persons”:
(i) explain their Kantian argument for living wage;
(ii) explain the objection that paying living wages will lead to higher unemployment and in turn harm workers’ interests;
(iii) explain one of Arnold and Bowie’s replies to this objection.
(2) You may make reference to Ian Maitland’s “The Great Non-Debate over International Sweatshops” in your answer to (ii). If you do, make sure that you explain his argument(s) clearly and sufficiently.
(3) For (iii), you should discuss a reply given by Arnold and Bowie that you think is significant/strong.
(4) Make sure to apply what we discussed in our writing workshops, e.g. stating the main thesis, writing topic sentences, etc.
(5) Word limit: 600 words (650 words max.)
Professor Name
Course
Date
Sweatshops and Respect for Persons
Introduction
In their article titled Sweatshops and Respect for Persons, Norman Bowie and Dennis Arnold talk about the work ethics that are often ignored by established companies and large enterprises (Arnold & Bowie, 76). Throughout the article, the authors have emphasized the need to pay good money to employees and help them improve their standards of living. However, they did oppose the Kant’s conceptions of human dignity in one way or the other (Arnold & Bowie, 2003).
Part 1
Norman Bowie and Dennis Arnold believed that Kant’s conceptions of human dignity were the basis for different obligations of employers to employees. Respecting employees, according to Norman and Dennis, does not mean all of their demands should be respected. In fact, it is all about refraining from coercion, following the labor laws, providing reasonable wages to employees, and taking good care of the safety standards (Irrera, 43). Kantian ethics argue that employees are an integral part of any organization and that they should not be taken for granted, but considered a valuable asset regardless of their job nature. Forcing sweatshop workers to work for pennies did not make any sense to Kant (Irrera, 2017).
Part 2
Norman Bowie and Dennis Arnold were of the view that Kant’s theory had not shed light on the fact that giving employees too much importance could cause problems for the organization. The competition among brands is high these days, and it may not be possible for all organizations to address employee-related issues on a priority basis. Nonetheless, they still appreciated and supported Kent’s point that raising wages once or twice a year is essential (Arnold & Bowie, 243). Howeve...
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to respect essays:
- Arnold and Bowie’s “Sweatshops and Respect For Persons”3 pages/≈825 words | 2 Sources | MLA | Business & Marketing | Term Paper |
- Pornographic Participation And Loss Of Respect3 pages/≈825 words | 3 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Intrinsic Respect As A Basis For Respect For Persons1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | MLA | Creative Writing | Essay |
- The Evolution Of Nursing, Future Prespectives Research 2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Research Paper |
- 06-d2-t2 Respect for Autonomy, Happy Health Hospital 1 page/≈275 words | 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- Self respect 3 pages/≈825 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Increase in Jail Term for Disrespect of National Anthem: China Takes Stern Action3 pages/≈825 words | 5 Sources | MLA | Social Sciences | Research Paper |