Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Other
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

Essay Instructions:

ase Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative
This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles of principlism.
Based on the "Case Study: Healing and Autonomy" and other required topic study materials, you will complete the "Applying the Four Principles: Case Study" document that includes the following:
Part 1: Chart
This chart will formalize principlism and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.
Part 2: Evaluation
This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
Attachments
PHI-413V-RS-T3ApplyingFourPrinciplesCaseStudy.docx
Attempt Start Date: 16-Mar-2020 at 12:00:00 AM
Due Date: 22-Mar-2020 at 11:59:59 PM
Maximum Points: 150.0


 


 



Applying the Four Principles: Case Study


Part 1: Chart (60 points)


Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.


 



Medical Indications


Beneficence and Nonmaleficence



Patient Preferences


Autonomy



 



 



Quality of Life


Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy



Contextual Features


Justice and Fairness



 



 




 


 


Part 2: Evaluation


Answer each of the following questions about how principlism would be applied:



  1. 1.      In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, which of the four principles is most pressing in this case? Explain why. (45 points)



 



 



  1. 2.      In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how might a Christian rank the priority of the four principles? Explain why. (45 points)



 



 


References:


Essay Sample Content Preview:
Applying the Four Principles: Case Study
Part 1: Chart (60 points)
Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.
Medical Indications
Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Patient Preferences
Autonomy

* Medical indications refer to the facts used to make a diagnosis and determine the nature of a health problem.
* Beneficence involves acting with the best intention while non-beneficence requires healthcare providers to prevent harm from occurring to the patient.
* James’ parents acted in his best interests even though it was obvious that his condition would worsen if not attended to by a doctor.
* They had no intent to harm James and they reported back to the hospital when his condition worsened.

* A patient’s preference is the expression of that patient’s choices. Autonomy focuses on the right of an individual to make a personal choice (Frank, 2013).
* From the case study, it is evident that the patient is underage (8 years), thus, unable to exercise his autonomy.
* However, James’ parents should have consulted with him to ensure he is aware and accepts any decision they make.
* The clinician should have educated the parents concerning James’ right of preference in terms of autonomy.

Quality of Life
Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy

Contextual Features
Justice and Fairness

* Quality of life relates to important medical elements of the life of an individual prior to and after receiving treatment.
* James’ condition improved after continuously undergoing dialysis.
* Nevertheless, his condition would be much better if he undergoes a kidney transplant. In this regard, his parents are torn between allowing his brother to donate his kidney or rely on faith.
* From a beneficence point of view, the parents should allow James to get a kidney transplant because his condition worsened when they relied on faith.
* However, they should consult James and his brother before making any decision.

* Contextual features refer to the familial, legal, and social surroundings that impact an individual healthcare decision (Gillon, 2018). James’ parents are influenced to rely on their faith rather than allow James to have a kidney transplant.
* The conflict of interest arises when Jame’ tissues match with that of his brother.
* James’ parents think that if faith does not heal their son, then it is only just and fair if one of them donates the kidney rather than their other son.

Part 2: Evaluation
Answer each of the...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to ethics essays: