Access and read the case - Voisine v. U.S. Social Sciences Essay

Voisine v. the United States
Author Name
University Name
Whether it is the United States, England, Canada or Asia, no government allows the residents to carry firearms illegally, and the unwise or excessive use of weapons is always discouraged. Certain policies have been implemented in this regard. In the history of the United States, Voisine v. the United States emerged as a prominent case in which the Court announced that the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban would be extended to those convicted of reckless domestic violence. Petitioners in this particular case were of the view that the federal government should not forbid them from keeping weapons or firearms. However, the government and the police were concerned about the safety and security of people. The arguments were technical, but the U.S. Supreme Court managed to reach its judgment with the 6-2 majority (Davis, 2017).
On June 27, 2016, the Supreme Court clarified that domestic abusers would not be permitted to carry weapons at any cost. Plus, their access to guns and pistols was ordered to be limited as soon as possible. The Court claimed that domestic violence is a big threat to the society and that the domestic abusers might buy firearms in excess in the future, so they were prohibited from purchasing any weapon. In February 2016, during the arguments, Justice Clarence Thomas asked some crucial questions when assistant solicitor general Ilana H. Eisenstein was about to wrap up her case. The same month, Justice Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor voted against the federal law. They favored domestic violence claiming that minor use of force is not bad at all. Sotomayor claimed that small acts of forcible touching are sometimes necessary at home. On the other h...