Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.4
Topic:

England in 1819 Summary

Essay Instructions:

ENG 2012 Paper #2 Assignment and Grading Rubric
The ENG 2012 paper #2 is a close reading of one poem, or a comparison of two works. Its length is 2 full pages, single-spaced, Times New Roman 12pt font (not 1.5 pages, not double-spaced). It is due the week after spring break, on Monday, March 21. It is a thesis-driven argument in which you state your thesis early in the paper, usually at the end of an opening paragraph that contextualizes the poem. A thesis is a concise statement of an argument, not a self-evident truth, which can be supported using evidence from the text. It is a position that you will argue rhetorically. Since you are writing about a poem, you will almost certainly make use of the formal elements – meter, rhyme, syntax, voice, form (as in, sonnet), and things like caesura, enjambment, etc. in the course of your argument. These elements of close reading ought to be synergetic with your argumentative thesis. 
To defend your thesis, you will have many options: quotes from the poem, narrative and character analysis, and identification of themes, symbols, metaphors. A little bit of history or biography of the author is acceptable, but not necessary. It should not be a research paper with numerous citations. With only two pages, there is no room for filler, superfluous spacing, autobiography, or plot summary. 
Poems to choose from :
shelley,
“Ozymandias,”
“England in 1819”;
Wordsworth
“The World is Too Much With Us,”
“Steamboats, Viaducts, and Railways” 
Keats
“To Autumn,”
“Ode to a Nightingale,”
“On the Grasshopper and Cricket” 
Whitman, “I think I could turn and live with animals” 
Bishop, “The Fish” 
Lawrence, “Snake” Dickinson, “#1400” 
Hughes, “The Negro Speaks of Rivers” 
Frost, “A Brook in the City” 
Williams, “Smell!”
Lowell, “Lilacs” 
Hahn, “The Calf” 
Collins, “The Golden Years” 
Zepeda, “It Is Going to Rain” 
Jeffers, “Passenger Pigeons” 

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Poem Reading Essay: England in 1819 by Percy Bysshe Shelley
Name
Course
Instructor
Date
In “England in 1819” by Percy Bysshe Shelley, the poet focuses on his surroundings critiquing the prevailing political climate in England and the place of the royalty in the British society. The sonnet has one stanza with fourteen lines. To Shelley, poets need to engage with the society, and power is one of his concerns. Those who hold power ultimately determine the direction of the society, they may work to improve the societal well-being, but they may also cater to the needs and interest of the ruling class while ignoring the plight of the commoner. This is an analysis of “England in 1819” focusing on his political beliefs and hopes that the English people would be better off without the uncaring royalty.
The opening two lines set the stage to explore the idea that the political situation in England in 1819 was oppressive. “An old, mad, blind, despised, and dying King; Princes, the dregs of their dull race, who flow.” Shelley establishes the case for a change in the political situation to loosen the political power wielded by the monarchy, while alluding that the King was not admired by the subjects, The poem is a political satire, and the ideas were radical at the time, but Shelley likens the political class to leeches who leave the people in poverty with no political freedom.
The poem is a lyric sonnet, with an iambic pentameter and a rhyming scheme of ABABABCDCDCCDD. The choice of the iambic pentameter allows the poet to use syntactic breaks on the meter, allows him to slow down and express his outrage at the corruption prevailing in the government structure as overseen by the monarchy. However, the rhyming pattern does not occur similar to other sonnets. Shelley laments about the social and political climate in England, and by using an unconventional form of the Sonnet structure and this emphasizes the view that the English society was dysfunctional in 1819 for the rulers disregarding the then people. Shelley’s approach also alters the thematic structure of the sonnet, and the first six lines focusing on the ruling class including the king and princes, while lines eight to fourteen focus on hope for change.
Shelley saw through the sham of the society where the rulers in England were despised, but unlike other people chose to write about this. In line 3, Shelley states, “Through public scorn? mud from a muddy spring.” This shows that even the public was disgusted with the ways of the king and his sons who disrespected the subjects by ignoring their plight even as they massed wealthy and limited political freedom. Despite the English rulers being out of touch, the people did not engage in civil disobedience. In the next line he wrote that, “Rulers who neither see nor feel nor know.” This signifies the prevailing notion that the ruling class was not aware about the issues affecting the subjects, and even their reactions to complaints or criticism was likely to be met with unjustified force.
Shelley also uses metaphors to highlight differences in the lives of the English royalty and the subjects. In lines 2-3 he associates the princes with dregs sim...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!